- From: Doyle-Work <dburnett@sesa.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:25:13 -0900
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, W3C Web Content <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Every intention of being on call today but something just came up that I cannot break free from...sorry. Doyle On 1/26/05 2:59 PM, "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote: > > > Time: 21:00 UTC (4 PM US Eastern, 10 PM France, 8 AM Friday Eastern > Australia) > > Number: +1-617-761-6200, passcode 9224 > irc.w3.org 6665, channel #wai-wcag > > 1.) Techniques Task Force Update > > 2.) Continued Discussion of Mapping of WCAG 1.0 checkpoints to WCAG 2.0 > success criteria. [2] [3] > > 3.) Baseline > > 4.) Definition of structure (Issue 506) [4] > > 5.) Additional pending issues: > - Issue 848: accept Loretta's proposal to reword? [5] > - Issue 887: accept Ben's explanation and close this bug? [6] > - Issue 499: covered in guideline 1.1? [7] > > [2] <http://tinyurl.com/68ahx> > [3] <http://tinyurl.com/3ne7q> > [4] <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=506> > [5] <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=848> > [6] <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=887> > [7] <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=499> > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2005 20:37:53 UTC