- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:52:16 -0600
- To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "Doyle-Work" <dburnett@sesa.org>, "W3C Web Content" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6EED8F7006A883459D4818686BCE3B3B7ADCC3@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu>
Gregg wrote: [ <blockquote> Because they must be technically accurate - and are not intended to be the instructional materials, i don't expect that we will manage to get them down to too low a level. But we should get them as simple and clear as possible. </blockquote> I[JMS] proposed a readability goal of 9th grade (first year of high school in the US) for the General Techniques because that is considered the upper limit for presenting technical content that includes new information and ideas. . [JMS] John [JMS] -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vande ________________________________ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John M Slatin Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 6:21 PM To: Doyle-Work; W3C Web Content Subject: RE: [Techniques]Draft requirements for General Techniques Doyle wrote: [jms] <blockquote> I just ran a Flesch Reading Ease score on our working draft guidelines [1] and came up with a 39.4 and a Flesch Grade Level of 12th grade. Granted, this test was automated through Microsoft Word but likely close enough to gain a little information about readability. I fully agree with what John has submitted in his proposal marked <proposed> below but have long-felt that the guidelines do not provide an easy read. [jms] </blockquote> Thanks for running the check, Doyle! I know we're not there yet. We'll work on it, and any help will be much appreciated. John <proposed> 1. The General Techniques must offer concrete strategies that can be implemented in a wide variety of technologies to satisfy specific success criteria 2. Each General Technique must clearly indicate what is required for conformance to the SC it applies to 3. Each technique must provide at least one clear example 4. Each general technique must be testable (support at least one checklist item) 5. The General Techniques must be clearly written a. Readable at or below 9th grade level (Flesch Reading Ease score 55 or higher ) 6. The General Techniques must serve the same diverse audiences as the Guidelines 7. Each General Technique must provide links to relevant technology-specific techniques 8. The General Techniques document(s) must stand in clear relation to other documents in the WCAG 2.0 collection </proposed> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ Doyle Burnett Doyle Burnett Education and Training Specialist Multiple Disabilities Program Special Education Service Agency dburnett@sesa.org Www.sesa.org --
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 14:52:17 UTC