- From: Michele Diodati <michele.diodati@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:57:58 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
John Slatin wrote: > You're correct: I do intend the term "structure" to encompass > "content." But this is not an arbitrary extension of the concept. It is > consistent with the definitions listed below, from Merria-Webster's > 10th Collegiate Dictionary (...) I read all the definitions you reported. Sincerely it seems to me that these definitions point out a meaning of the word "structure" very similar to that I am trying to propose. In particular you refer to definitions 4a 4b and 5 as examples of structure that "encompasses" content. Doing to my imperfect knowledge of English, I probably used the verb "to encompass" in a wrong way, but I meant that structure surely refers to contents (it organizes them), but it is a _different thing_ with respect to contents. According to this idea, definition 4a says that structure is: "the arrangement of particles or parts in a substance or body ". Structure is "the arrangement", that is the particular organization of particles or parts in a body, but it is not the various parts and particles. Definition 4b seems to me even clearer: "organization of parts as dominated by the general character of the whole". The accent is on organization. Even when a definition refers without doubt to a material thing, i.e. to a content, it seems to me rather a figure of speech. For example, when "structure" is used in the meaning of "something (as a building) that is constructed", it seems to be a synecdoche, where the part (the structure) stands for the whole (the building). Ultimately, it isn't my intention to quibble over this definition. I just made a proposal that you are free to accept or refuse. > For me, the critical difficulty with this definition is that it seems too > narrowly focused on a single "resource" such as a "delivery unit," > when I think it will probably have to be capable of handling > collections of delivery units (e.g., entire sites as well as single > pages within those sites). I agree with your opinion, but I wouldn't forget the necessity to distinguish when structure refers to markup code in a web page from when structure refers to objects in the real world. Saluti, Michele -- http://www.diodati.org
Received on Monday, 17 January 2005 22:58:29 UTC