- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:32:42 -0600
- To: "'David MacDonald'" <befree@magma.ca>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <auto-000218211824@spamarrest.com>
David We have this wonderful term and concept of "delivery unit" that addresses this I think. The guidelines only deal with the "delivery unit" - so that would take care of the problem you describe I believe. PS - if the source invokes a transcoder then the output of the transcoder is the "delivery unit". If the user invokes a transcoder of their choice - then the transcoder is a 'user agent' and the delivery unit is what goes INTO the transcoder. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison _____ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David MacDonald Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 8:53 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Bug 506 - Defn of Structure Quite a while back I was assigned the task of clarifying the definition of structure based on University of Kansas comments. http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=506 My proposed wording is in the Doc now. But the bug is still sending me daily reminders, I think perhaps because an action item was taken by Jason and John to look at it. There is one piece of the University of Kansas' concerns that have not yet been addressed. That is the clarification between structural backend code, and structure of what is delivered to the client.(For example the difference between backend PHP commands, which they consider to be structural elements, that the user doesn't receive and HTML code like H1, H2 etc that the user does receive.) So I think they would want a phrase like "structural elements that are received by the client" in the definition. I don't know if we can make that distinction without getting into some nasty gray areas with transcoders and the like.but I though I would bring it up since that was their concern. And I'm hoping to close the bug and the friendly daily Bugzilla emails. Cheers David MacDonald
Received on Saturday, 15 January 2005 18:32:47 UTC