- From: Alistair Garrison <alistair.garrison@accessinmind.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:37:16 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <20050110183720.530E438007@smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net>
Dear All, I believe there is a need for each technique to contain one or more simple statements which define the conditions under which the technique is deemed applicable - an example of such a statement might be simply 'This technique is applicable if one or more data-tables have been used'. The benefit of doing this is that it allows a user to determine without doubt whether or not a technique is relevant to their situation - if it is applicable they can proceed to test whether it is 'passed' or 'failed', and if it isn't they can mark it as 'non-applicable'. By providing 'applicability conditions' I believe it further strengthens the 'testability' of the guidelines. This extra step ensures that decisions as to 'applicability' can be made with certainty, providing an almost prescriptive framework (taking into account 'testable statements') by which a technique can being declared as 'passed', 'failed' or 'non-applicable'. Please let me know your thoughts. Alistair Garrison Managing Director Accessinmind Limited UK Filial Tel.: 0046 8 44 65 287 Website: http://www.accessinmind.com IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, is for the addressee only. It may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If it has come to you in error, please notify the sender immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy, print, distribute or rely on its contents. All e-mails and any attachments are believed, but not warranted, to be virus free. However, all e-mails should be virus checked before being downloaded and we accept no responsibility therefore.
Received on Monday, 10 January 2005 18:37:53 UTC