- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:08:33 +0200
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-id: <068201c4f3e0$17a1a570$680aa8c0@IBMA4E63BE0B9E>
We were discussing yesterday testing site, how many sites to test before we know how reliable a test or affect is. (I mentioned testing for computer components but that was probably not the point.) When UB was making the test plan for SWAP on whole sites what we tested separately on different verticals, in other words types of sites, because what typical code and components on one type of site is vastly different content to a different type of site. For examples, you could take the vertical of middle sized law firms, and you would find very different behavior and use of mark up to, say, middle sized law firms, or large sized banks or universities etc.... We found the magic number to be a bout five sites per vertical to get to about 90% of the issues. In a way a commercial company has it easer because we did not have to segment all the types of sites out there, only the ones that were relevant for our marketing. So , for example we did not test five blogging sites ( Middle sized, small or large...) but i would assume typical blogging HTML and accessibility issues to be very different form bank law firms or universities..... So while the conversion of test affects are very important it will be a lot of work by and getting them stable is going to be a lot moving target. And the only way to get anywhere close will be by using a lot of testers -in which case we should be asking the interest group to help go over the tests and tell us what I would still like to see on the test pages, even the drafts, the disclaimer that we discused. Some thing along the lines of, "these test have been developed as a useful tool to help people find and understand accessibility violations. They do not guarantee accessibility, and user testing is always recommended. " Keep well and all the best, Lisa Lisa Seeman UB Access Tel: +972-2-648-3782 (please note our new number) Website: www.ubaccess.com THIS E-MAIL CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND IS INTENDED FOR THE RECIPIENT OF THIS E-MAIL ONLY.
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2005 11:09:17 UTC