- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:48:09 -0600
- To: "Yvette P. Hoitink" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>, "WAI GL \(E-mail\)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Yvette Hoitink wrote: <blockquote> In my own experience, I have found multiple labels quite useful from both a usability and accessibility point of view. I will give you a real-world example: I created a maintenance form, where the administrator had to choose what image the use: the current one or the new one. I presented the images side-by-side, with radio buttons underneath each image. Radio button 1 had a text beside it: "use current version", radio button 2 read: "use new version". Image 1 had an alt describing the current version of the image, image 2 had an alt describing the new version of the image. I used two labels for each radiobutton: both the text next to the radio button and the associated image were labels for the same radiobutton. Both labels combined tell you what the radiobutton means. Using two labels has the additional benefit that people with limited motor functions can either click the text or click anywhere on the entire image to select their preference. That could not have been achieved with only 1 label. For people with vision problems, I think using the title-attribute could in many cases replace the need for an extra label. But there are more accessibility benefits from using labels than just for people with visual problems: it helps people with limited motor functions as well. Especially for the latter group, having multiple labels can be a big help because it gives them a larger click-target. That cannot be achieved by using a title-attribute. It can also help people with cognitive disabilities because it allows you to use both a text and an image as operable elements. It is not always possible to put them both in the same label-element. So I would advocate that we allow multiple labels in HTML and would like it if it were part of UAAG that all labels are read by AT. </blockquote> Elegant and persuasive. Thanks, Yvette! John
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2004 15:48:11 UTC