- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:17:17 +0100
- To: "Gez Lemon" <gl@juicystudio.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gez Lemon" <gl@juicystudio.com> To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 8:46 PM Subject: Re: WCAG 2.0 Test Suite Hi Chris, I think the test suite would be better if the DOCTYPE of the examples HTML 4.01 Strict rather than a transitional DOCTYPE. I appreciate that a transitional DOCTYPE is a legal DOCTYPE, but the spirit of a transitional DOCTYPE is to help developers make a transition from HTML 3.2 to either HTML 4.01, or XHTML 1.0. Also, the examples I've looked at mix XHTML in an HTML transitional DOCTYPE. Roberto Scano: Fully agree with Gez. We need to refer to XHTML 1.0 Strict, instead of the "old" HTML 4.01, otherwise how can we help te evolution of the www?
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2004 08:17:31 UTC