[1.1 L1 SC1] Proposed change

<current>
1. For all non-text content that is functional, such as graphical links
or buttons,
text alternatives
identify the purpose or function of the non-text content. [I]
</current>
 
<proposed>
1. For all non-text content that is functional, such as graphical links
or buttons,
text alternatives
provide the same function as the non-text content. [I]
</proposed>
 
Rationale:
Clears up a potential ambiguity- the text alternative should do more
than simply *identifying* the function or purpose of the non-text
content.
 
I believbe this is an editorial change that does not affect the
substance of the success criterion.
 
John
 

"Good design is accessible design." 
John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Accessibility Institute
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/
<http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/>