- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:09:30 -0600
- To: "Jason White" <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>, "Sailesh Panchang" <spanchang02@yahoo.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Jason writes: <blockquote> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Sailesh Panchang wrote: > If content does not comply with 1.3 SC 1, it cannot claim conformance > with all level 1 SC anyway. I do not see the point of repeating the > same SC here under 2.4. This has generated a lot of opposition in the teleconferences and on the list. Here is a suggestion, for now, let's make it a cross-reference to 1.3 L 1 SC 1. </blockquote> I agree that we should make this a cross-reference. And let's do it in a way that conforms to 1.3. Does the DTD include a crossreference attribute or linktype that's different from a simple link to a named anchor? John
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 00:09:31 UTC