- From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 22:39:10 +0000 (UTC)
- To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> AGENDA
>
> * Continue discussion of contentious techniques [1]
Only three are marked contentious. That ranking is itself contentious. The
contentious items seem *exceedingly* minor (who the hell needs a guideline
about <address>?), and the table itself recapitulates the falsehood that
WCAG 2 requires three priority levels.
It is interesting to note the results of a straw poll in which only the
nobility got to vote. If you had the money to jet off to Dublin, you had a
vote. Maybe this is a kind of head tax. I think it's *fascinating*.
> [1] [17]http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2004/10/21-priority-voting.html
Wasn't there ever anything else posted to the list about the Dublin f2f?
Something standard and universally done, like minutes?
--
Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 22:39:20 UTC