- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:52:11 +1100
- To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Cc: "'Lisa Seeman'" <lisa@ubaccess.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Gregg Vanderheiden writes: > > While I agree with your comments - I don't see how we can add anything to > conformance that is not a success criteria. Conformance simply says that > you have met the SC at some level for some content. Gregg is correct here. If you want something to be included in WCAG 2.0 conformance claims, it has to become a success criterion, which implies in turn that it has to be reliably testable. WCAG 2.0 does not restrict whatever else authors may publicly state about the accessibility of their content; but any such claims will not be part of the WCAG 2.0 conformance.
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 08:53:19 UTC