- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:47:01 +1100
- To: lguarino@adobe.com
- Cc: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
lguarino@adobe.com writes: > > I think this would make it much more likely that owners of large web sites would post a claim. So I think it is a good thing. But will it make it harder for a user to determine the status of a particular URI within that tree? Whatever methods we allow, they need to be unambiguous. One solution would be to permit regular expressions: The resource at every URI matching http://trace.wisc.edu/public/.* conforms to xxx except for [explicit list of exceptions (which may themselves be regular expressions)] A simple program could then take a URI and determine whether it was in the scope of the conformance claim or not.
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 03:47:44 UTC