Thursday, 1 April 2004
- RE: Screen Reader and Bookmarking
- Re: Screen Reader and Bookmarking
- Re: agenda 4-1-04
- RE: agenda 4-1-04
Wednesday, 31 March 2004
- Re: [techs] text equivalents in links
- RE: [techs] text equivalents in links
- [techs] Update Test Matrix
- [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 31 March 2004
- Next week regrets
- Screen Reader and Bookmarking
- Italian accessibility law - Complete english text
- Italian accessibility law - English translation
- Regrets (RE: agenda 4-1-04)
- agenda 4-1-04
Tuesday, 30 March 2004
- regrets Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 31 March 2004
- RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 31 March 2004
- [techs] Techniques Teleconference 31 March 2004
- RE: [techs] text euiqvalents in links
- RE: [techs] text euiqvalents in links
- Re: [techs] text euiqvalents in links
- FW: [techlunch] FW: NCD FYI: Article: AIIM meeting sets PDF/Access standard in motion
- Error in CSS Techniques for WCAG 1.0 sample code
- RE: Another attempt at the conformance levels (was Action item: Proposed rewrite of conformance section)
- RE: [techs] text euiqvalents in links
Monday, 29 March 2004
- RE: [techs] text euiqvalents in links
- [techs] text euiqvalents in links
- Re: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG
- Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG
- Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG
- Another attempt at the conformance levels (was Action item: Proposed rewrite of conformance section)
- RE: Action item: proposed rewrite of conformance section
- Action item: proposed rewrite of conformance section
- RE: PLEASE DONT INCLUDE PEOPLE ON LIST WITH LIST ADDRESSES
- Types of content
- Re: PLEASE DONT INCLUDE PEOPLE ON LIST WITH LIST ADDRESSES
Sunday, 28 March 2004
Saturday, 27 March 2004
- PLEASE DONT INCLUDE PEOPLE ON LIST WITH LIST ADDRESSES
- Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG
- Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG
- Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG
Friday, 26 March 2004
- Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG
- FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: R: 2 or 3 levels: beware of the compromise effect
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- R: 2 or 3 levels: beware of the compromise effect
- [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 24 March 2004
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
Wednesday, 24 March 2004
Friday, 26 March 2004
Thursday, 25 March 2004
- 2 or 3 levels: beware of the compromise effect
- Late regrets 3-25
- RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 24 March 2004
- Re: agenda 3-25-04
- Regrets: agenda 3-25-04
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Regrets, teleconference 3-25-04
- conformance related issues
- agenda Details
- Proposed rewording for 3.1 SC (was Clever Keys, dictionary.com, etc.)
- Public comment on WCAG in the UK
- RE: agenda 3-25-04
- Re: agenda 3-25-04
- agenda 3-25-04
Wednesday, 24 March 2004
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
- Opera announces new browser with embedded IBM ViaVoice
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 24 March 2004
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
Tuesday, 23 March 2004
- [techs] Techniques Teleconference 24 March 2004
- RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
- RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
- RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
- RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
- Re: Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism.
- Re: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
Monday, 22 March 2004
Friday, 19 March 2004
- RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
- RE: Personae
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (2)
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- RE: Personae
- RE: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism.
- CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
Thursday, 18 March 2004
- Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- R: [techs] granularity and testing...
- RE: [techs] granularity and testing...
- R: [techs] granularity and testing...
- Re: Personae
- RE: Personae
- RE: [techs] tester reliability
- [techs] granularity and testing...
- RE: Personae
Wednesday, 17 March 2004
- Re: R: Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism.
- Re: Personae
- APPLE previews Mac OS X Spoken Interface
- Re: Personae
- R: Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism.
- RE: Personae
- R: Personae
- RE: Personae
- RE: Personae
- RE: Personae
- RE: Personae
- Personae
- Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism.
Tuesday, 16 March 2004
- NO Teleconf Call this week
- Fwd: redesign of QA Framework
- RE: colors
- RE: colors -the other foot
- RE: [techs] CANCELLED Techniques - and an apology..
Wednesday, 10 March 2004
Monday, 15 March 2004
- R: my comments on the last draft
- RE: colors
- RE: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations?
- my comments on the last draft
- RE: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations? - Additional note
- RE: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations?
- 2.4 Facilitate the ability of users to orient themselves and move within the content
- colors
- RE: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations?
- RE: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations?
Sunday, 14 March 2004
- RE: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations?
- Re: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations?
- [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations?
Friday, 12 March 2004
Thursday, 11 March 2004
- Comments on draft. part 1.
- Re: spelling errors in new draft
- spelling errors in new draft
- Fw: WAI Glossary changelog
- Regrets
- Regrets March 11
- FW: [Closed] Re: Request to publish WCAG 2.0 as WD
- RE: Regrets March 11
- 11 March 2004 Working Draft published
- Regrets 3-11-04
- FW: agenda 3-11-04
Wednesday, 10 March 2004
Tuesday, 9 March 2004
- [techs] Summary of Face to Face meeting, 4-5 March 2004
- Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 10 March 2004
- Regrets...RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 10 March 2004
- [techs] Techniques Teleconference 10 March 2004
- Jason White's message - Should we move 3.1 Level 3 Success Criteria to Gateway?
Monday, 8 March 2004
Friday, 5 March 2004
- RE: rewrites of 3.1 Level 2 Suc #4
- RE: Attachments Re: edits.doc
- RE: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
- Re: Attachments Re: edits.doc
- Attachments Re: edits.doc
- edits.doc
- RE: [1.1] Exception for text equivalent (non-urgent)
- regrets
- RE: [1.1] Exception for text equivalent (non-urgent)
Thursday, 4 March 2004
- RE: rewrites of 3.1 Level 2 Suc #4
- rewrites of 3.1 Level 2 Suc #4
- re: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
- RE: [2.5] Extra succes criterion (non-urgent)
- RE: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
- RE: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
- RE: [2.5] Extra succes criterion (non-urgent)
- RE: agenda 3-4-04
- [2.5] Benefits formulated as problems
- re: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
- Re: agenda 3-4-04
- [2.5] Extra succes criterion (non-urgent)
- Re: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
- FW: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
- RE: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
- [1.1] Exception for text equivalent (non-urgent)
- RE: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
- Re: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
- RE: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
- Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
- Re: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
- TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links, correct typo
- TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
- RE: [2.3] Benefits formulated as problems (low priority)
- Working Draft - 2.0 - 1 March 2004
- [2.3] Benefits formulated as problems (low priority)
- [wcag2] Redirect issues
- Re: agenda 3-4-04
- RE: agenda 3-4-04 (Regrets)
Wednesday, 3 March 2004
- RE: [2.4] Text error in lvl 2 SC # 2
- [2.4] Text error in lvl 2 SC # 2
- R: New WD 2004-03-01 (Guideline 1.4 - 1.5)
- Re: [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (Update) (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang'))
- Re: [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang'))
- Re: [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang'))
- Re: [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang'))
- [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang'))
- New WD 2004-03-01 (Guideline 1.4 - 1.5)
- Regrets Re: agenda 3-4-04
- agenda 3-4-04
Tuesday, 2 March 2004
- Re: 1.6 (was 1.5) cleanup proposal + proposal to merge with 2.4
- Re: 1.6 (was 1.5) cleanup proposal + proposal to merge with 2.4
- RE: 1.6 (was 1.5) cleanup proposal + proposal to merge with 2.4
- Proposed Level 3 success criterion for Guideline 3.1
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- RE: Telecon Today
Monday, 1 March 2004
Wednesday, 25 February 2004
Sunday, 29 February 2004
Friday, 27 February 2004
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer from Michael Cooper
- RE: [techs] Action to test WCAG 1.0 10.2 - form labels
- [techs] Test WCAG 1.0 7.4 and 7.5 (refresh and redirect)
- Re: [techs] Action to test WCAG 1.0 10.2 - form labels
- [techs] Action to test WCAG 1.0 10.2 - form labels
- [techs] Agenda for Technical Plenary Face to Face
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- Telecon Today
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
Thursday, 26 February 2004
- RE: safe selection [was: Re: RE 3.2 was 3.4]
- Re: conformance level proposal
- Re: conformance level proposal
- Re: 1.2 Cleanup
- RE: 3 Editorial Changes to Front End
- RE: conformance level proposal
- RE: Agenda 2-26-2004
- RE: Agenda 2-26-2004
- RE: [1.2 SC 5] Requiring equivalents for real-time non-interactive video
- Re: conformance level proposal
- [1.2 SC 5] Requiring equivalents for real-time non-interactive video
- [1.2 SC 5] Requiring equivalents for real-time non-interactive video
- proposed editorial changes (front matter and guideline 1.1)
- [1.2 lvl2 SC] Synchronized equivalents not possible for real-time broadcasts
- Re: Agenda 2-26-2004
- RE: conformance level proposal
- Re: conformance level proposal
- RE: conformance level proposal
- conformance level proposal
- Regrets: Re: Agenda 2-26-2004
- RE: safe selection [was: Re: RE 3.2 was 3.4]
- safe selection [was: Re: RE 3.2 was 3.4]
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- RE: Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "consistent"
- RE: FW: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved
- RE: RE 3.2 was 3.4
- Re: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- Re: FW: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved
- RE: RE 3.2 was 3.4
- RE: Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "consistent"
- RE: Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "consistent"
- Comments on 3.2 was 3.4 - Action item - proposed wording
- Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "predictable"
- Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "consistent"
- Re: top-down look at son-of-ABBR
- RE 3.2 was 3.4
Wednesday, 25 February 2004
- RE: [techs/WCAG 1.0 errata] Test cases for WCAG 1.0 "until user agents" checkpoints
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 25 February 2004
- Re: 3 Editorial Changes to Front End
- RE: Agenda 2-26-2004
- R: Agenda 2-26-2004
- FW: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved
- Re: Agenda 2-26-2004
- Re: Consistency of Principles: change "should" to "must" in number 4
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- Revised proposal for Guideline 3.2 (was Proposed rewording for Guieline 3.4)
- RE: Consistency of Principles
- Re: Consistency of Principles
- RE: Consistency of Principles
- Dont get Edit Shock - it isnt as bad as it looks
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- Dont get Edit Shock - it isnt as bad as it looks
- Dont get Edit Shock - it isnt as bad as it looks
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- [TECH] mapping HTML Techniques of 1.0 to 2.0 techniques.
- RE: Question on <abbr /> element use
- top-down look at son-of-ABBR
- bottom-up look at son-of-ABBR
- RE: Question on <abbr /> element use
- Re: Agenda 2-26-2004 - REGRETS
- RE: Question on <abbr /> element use
- RE: Question on <abbr /> element use
- John Slatin's Rework of 3.1 list of strategies for reducing complexity etc. Appendix E
- RE: Question on <abbr /> element use
- RE: Question on <abbr /> element use
- Question on <abbr /> element use
- Regrets: Agenda 2-26-2004
- Regrets: Agenda 2-26-2004
- Agenda 2-26-2004
- RE: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved
- 2.5 Clean Up
- 2.4 CLEANUP - Does NOT resolve all open issues
- 1.2 Cleanup
Tuesday, 24 February 2004
- [techs/WCAG 1.0 errata] Test cases for WCAG 1.0 "until user agents" checkpoints
- 3 Editorial Changes to Front End
- Normative formatting
- Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
- Consistency of Principles
- Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
- Well-mannered discussion Re: Bookmarks for topics of interest
- [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 18 February 2004
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- [techs] Techniques Teleconference 25 February 2004
- # Regrets for Thurs. telecon - will be traveling to tech. plenary
- RE: 2.3 cleanup- URL reference?
- RE: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')
- Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')
- Re: 2.3 cleanup- URL reference?
- RE: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')
- RE: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')
- [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')
- RE: Proposed New 1.3 based on Yvette's Analysis (+ new examples)
- FW: 2.3 cleanup
Monday, 23 February 2004
- Re: Proposed New 1.3 based on Yvette's Analysis
- Re: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved
- [btw] Accessibility & source analysis
- Proposed New 1.3 based on Yvette's Analysis
Sunday, 22 February 2004
Saturday, 21 February 2004
Friday, 20 February 2004
- W3C Weekly News - 20 February 2004
- Re: CSUN
- [tech] Your WCAG Bugzilla 740
- RE: The Page Paradigm
- RE: The Page Paradigm
- The Page Paradigm
Thursday, 19 February 2004
- [UBER 3.1] natural language can be identified?
- FYI: Resources for splitting up compound words
- Re: Agenda - Late regrets
- RE: Agenda -late
- Regrets Feb 19
- Re: CSUN
- Re: Agenda (regrets)
- RE: Action item: Proposed wording for Guideline 3.4
- Re: Action item: Proposed wording for Guideline 3.4
- Re: [html-techs] Table Type
- RE: CSUN
- Re: CSUN
- CSUN
Wednesday, 18 February 2004
- Personae
- RE: Agenda (regrets)
- Re: Action item: Proposed wording for Guideline 3.4
- RE: Doctype and Assistive Technologies
- Re: Agenda
- Agenda
- RE: New proposed 2.3
- Doctype and Assistive Technologies
- Issue Summaries for guidelines 1.4, 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3
Tuesday, 17 February 2004
- UBER 3.1 proposal -- to combine 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 1.4
- Bugs addressed by 2.3 rewrite
- New proposed 2.3
- [techs] Techniques Teleconference 18 February 2004
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer from Michael Cooper
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer from Michael Cooper
- Action item: Proposed wording for Guideline 3.4
- Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer from Michael Cooper
- Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
Monday, 16 February 2004
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- Absolute units (was: Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer)
- Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
Sunday, 15 February 2004
- RE: Use of the word "appropriate" in 2.0 guidelines
- Guideline 1.2 - Overview and summary
- CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- February 14, 2004 Working Draft Published
Friday, 13 February 2004
- RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- Re: TFOOT accessibility
- RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- Re: TFOOT accessibility
- Re: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- Re: TFOOT accessibility
- Re: TFOOT accessibility
- Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- Re: TFOOT accessibility
- Re: TFOOT accessibility
- RE: TFOOT accessibility
- TFOOT accessibility
Thursday, 12 February 2004
- Re: Use of the word "appropriate" in 2.0 guidelines
- Use of the word "appropriate" in 2.0 guidelines
- late regrets
- regrets
- RE: Agenda - regrets
- Re: Agenda
- RE: Agenda (regrets)
Wednesday, 11 February 2004
- RE: [TECH] CSS techniques mapping the 1.0 Techniques to the 2.0 Techniques
- [TECH] CSS techniques mapping the 1.0 Techniques to the 2.0 Techniques
- 11 Feb 2004 - Techniques Task Force of the WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
- regrets
- W3C Weekly News - 11 February 2004
- Agenda
Tuesday, 10 February 2004
- Re: wcag727.htm (was Add browser support section to each CSS concept section/example)
- RE: Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5
- Re: Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5
- Re: Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5
- [css-techs] Issue# 725 - Applying same style sheet to both HTML and XML
- [css-techs] Issue# 728 - Units of Measure
- [css-techs] Issue# 727 - Add browser support section to each CSS concept section/example
- [css-techs] Issue# 726 - Order of CSS Concepts in Document
- Regrets: [techs] Techniques Task Force Teleconference 11 February 2004
- [techs] Hotel information for technical plenary meeting
- Re: Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5
- Re: [html-techs] Table Type
- [techs] Techniques Task Force Teleconference 11 February 2004
- action item reminder
- RE: [html-techs] Table Type
- RE: [html-techs] Table Type
- RE: [html-techs] Table Type
- Re: [html-techs] Table Type
- Re: [html-techs] Table Type
- RE: [html-techs] Table Type
- RE: [html-techs] Table Type
- RE: [html-techs] Table Type
- [html-techs] Table Type
- RE: Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5
- Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5
Monday, 9 February 2004
- Colour Contrast: what about opacity?
- Re: [techs] Technical Plenary registration
- Re: [techs] Technical Plenary registration
- [techs] Technical Plenary registration
- Re: Conformance-logos
- RE: simple language testable thing
- RE: simple language testable thing
Sunday, 8 February 2004
- RE: Request for volunteers: Guideline summaries
- Re: Conformance-logos
- Betr.: Re: Conformance-logos
- Re: Conformance-logos
- RE: simple language testable thing
- RE: simple language testable thing
Saturday, 7 February 2004
- RE: Request for volunteers: Guideline summaries
- Re: Bookmarks for topics of interest
- Re: Bookmarks for topics of interest
Friday, 6 February 2004
- Re: list of online dictionaries
- list of online dictionaries
- Bookmarks for topics of interest
- Re: Conformance-logos
- Conformance-logos
- RE: diacritic marks
- RE: diacritic marks from by way of Wendy A Chisholm
- RE: simple language testable thing
- RE: diacritic marks from by way of Wendy A Chisholm
- RE: diacritic marks
- RE: simple language testable thing
- RE: diacritic marks from by way of Wendy A Chisholm
- Re: diacritic marks
Thursday, 5 February 2004
- FW: diacritic marks
- Re: diacritic marks
- RE: diacritic marks
- W3C Weekly News - 5 February 2004
- Request for volunteers: Guideline summaries
- RE: simple language testable thing
- [Tech] RDF Techniques - First attempt
- RE: simple language testable thing
- RE: simple language testable thing
- Influence of valid code
- Re: erratum? Re: 04 Feb 2004 - Techniques
- erratum? Re: 04 Feb 2004 - Techniques
Wednesday, 4 February 2004
- Re: diacritic marks
- Re: 04 Feb 2004 - Techniques Task Force of the WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
- Michael P Craddock, : regrets, will be traveling
- RE: simple language testable thing
- 04 Feb 2004 - Techniques Task Force of the WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
- RE: simple language testable thing
- RE: simple language testable thing
- RE: simple language testable thing
- RE: simple language testable thing
- Re: character sets RE: simple language testable thing
- character sets RE: simple language testable thing
- RE: simple language testable thing
- RE: simple language testable thing
- Agenda 2/5/2004
Tuesday, 3 February 2004
- RE: diacritic marks
- Dutch quality mark initiative: Clarification of WCAG 1
- RE: simple language testable thing
- Re: simple language testable thing
- RE: 3.3- time to take a step back?
- diacritic marks
- simple language testable thing
Monday, 2 February 2004
- FW: [techlunch] MS study: The Wide Range of Abilities and Its Impact On Computer Technology
- Re: 3.3- time to take a step back?
- 3.3- time to take a step back?
Saturday, 31 January 2004
Friday, 30 January 2004
- Re: Agenda
- [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 28 January 2004
- RE: Jan 29 minutes
- Guideline 2.1 Proposal
- RE: Jan 29 minutes
- Re: Jan 29 minutes
- RE: Jan 29 minutes
- RE: Jan 29 minutes
- Jan 29 minutes
Thursday, 29 January 2004
- Re: Agenda
- Partial regrets for today
- Regrets [WAS: Agenda]
- regrets Re: Agenda
- Regrets
- Re: [btw] European Web Accessibility Policy
- [btw] European Web Accessibility Policy
- Re: Agenda
- Agenda
Wednesday, 28 January 2004
- Proposals for Principle 4
- Re: Late regrets [techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 January 2004
- Re: test (VIRUS)
- regrets for wednesday and thursday mtgs; request for scribe for thursday's call
Tuesday, 27 January 2004
- fyi: limits of bandwidth
- [techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 January 2004
- RE: WCAG and some linguistics problems
- [3.4] Overview and summary of guideline 3.4
- Re: [3.4] Overview and summary of guideline 3.4
- [techs] Blockquote (and how to propose?)
- Action Item for Guideline 4.3
- [3.4] Overview and summary of guideline 3.4
- Re: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3
- 22 Jan 2004 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Monday, 26 January 2004
Sunday, 25 January 2004
- Your Ship Has Come In! This Time You Are Not At The Airport!
- RE: Checklists Normative?
- Re: Checklists Normative?
- Checklists Normative?
- Your Ship Has Come In! This Time You Are Not At The Airport!
- Re: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1
- RE: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1
- RE: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1
Saturday, 24 January 2004
Friday, 23 January 2004
- FW: [techlunch] U.N. Group Drafts Text Of International Disability Convention
- Late regrets for Jan. 22
- Re: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1
Thursday, 22 January 2004
- [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 21 January 2004
- RE: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3
- DHTML Accessibility
- thesis up on the web
Wednesday, 21 January 2004
- RE: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3
- What Experts Are
- Re: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3
- Late regrets, Techniques Teleconference 21 January 2004
- RE: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1
- Re: What DHTML
- Re: TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links
- Re: TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
- TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
- Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004
- RE: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3
- regrets Re: This week's agenda
- This week's agenda
Tuesday, 20 January 2004
- Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004
- Re: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3
- Re: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1
- W3C Weekly News - 15 January 2004
- Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004
- [WCAG 1.0 Errata] Process questions (was: Re: [WCAG 1.0 Errata: Issue #14] Checkpoint 10.2)
- Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 21 January 2004
- [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 21 January 2004
- [techs] Techniques Teleconference 21 January 2004
Monday, 19 January 2004
Sunday, 18 January 2004
Saturday, 17 January 2004
Friday, 16 January 2004
- Regrets and more belated regrets
- Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004
- Re: [WCAG 1.0 Errata: Issue #14] Checkpoint 10.2
- Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004
- Re: Screen Enlargement Software
- Screen Enlargement Software
- [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004
- belated regrets
- Regrets [re: Draft agenda]
- RE: action item: definition of Event Handler
Thursday, 15 January 2004
- Re: action item: definition of Event Handler
- Re: action item: definition of Event Handler
- Re: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface
- RE: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface
- Draft agenda
Wednesday, 14 January 2004
- Re: List of action items, incomplete minutes from 8 January
- Late regrets, Techniques Teleconference 14 January 2004
- Re: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface
- Re: Notes from Matt McMahon presentation on color blindness at UW
- Re: Notes from Matt McMahon presentation on color blindness at UW
- [WCAG 1.0 Errata: Issue #14] Checkpoint 10.2
- partial regrets, need someone to take minutes
- Another interesting group
- regrets for 30 min
- Re: BBC headline: Web opens up for learning disabled
- Re: Notes from Matt McMahon presentation on color blindness at UW
Tuesday, 13 January 2004
- RE: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface
- Re: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface
- Re: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface
- action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface
- RE: Functions or outcomes that can be expressed in words
- RE: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features
- Re: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features
Monday, 12 January 2004
- Functions or outcomes that can be expressed in words
- Re: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features
- List of action items, incomplete minutes from 8 January
Wednesday, 7 January 2004
Monday, 12 January 2004
Friday, 9 January 2004
- Re: Use of Axis in data-table for categorizing cells
- Notes from Matt McMahon presentation on color blindness at UW
- Re: 2.1 Overview and proposal
- RE: 2.1 Overview and proposal
- Re: 2.1 Overview and proposal
Thursday, 8 January 2004
- Re: 2.1 Overview and proposal
- Re: question on WCAG 2.0
- Re: Agenda, regrets
- Re: Agenda, regrets
- Agenda, regrets
- question on WCAG 2.0
- [techs] Summary of Techniques teleconference 07 January 2004
- Re: Use of Axis in data-table for categorizing cells
- Regrets for today
- RE: Agenda, regrets
- Re: Regrets Re: Agenda
- RE: Agenda
- regrets
- Regrets Re: Agenda
- Agenda
Wednesday, 7 January 2004
- Regrets for TC
- Re: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features
- Re: Use of Axis in data-table for categorizing cells
- RE: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features
- Re: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features
- Use of Axis in data-table for categorizing cells
- Re: [techs] New draft: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0 (A & R Units)
- RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
- Regrets 8 January (+ happy new year everyone!)
- RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
- RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
- [techs] Additional resource for text equivalents section
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
- RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
Tuesday, 6 January 2004
- Re: Colour contrast verification tool
- [techs] Announcement: Techniques task force face-to-face at W3C Technical Plenary
- Re: 1.4 text in the content is provided in Unicode or sufficient information is provided so that it can be automatically mapped back to Unicode. [X]
- Re: 1.4 text in the content is provided in Unicode or sufficient information is provided so that it can be automatically mapped back to Unicode. [X]
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
- [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004