- From: Maurizio Boscarol <maurizio@usabile.it>
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 01:07:59 +0100
- To: "WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
Thank you very much, Wendy, for your good explanation. > >The fact is: why are we using here "Until user agents"? Does it mean that if > >user agents would allow user to turn off the popup, then the author can use > >the popup? > > Yes, that is what it means. Ok. > >That is what I understand, but I think it's wrong. We should move > >this check point from guideline 10, and reformulate it as "do not cause > >pop-ups or other windows to appear and do not change the current window > >without informing the user" and put it perhaps in guideline 13? > > If we publish a revised WCAG 1.0, it will be to correct errors; not to make > substantive changes. Ok. There were two positions in the discussion in the webaccessibile ML. One position were guessing that the check point wanted authors not to open popup windows at all. I wasn't originally thinking that, but the discussion made me doubtful. So we asked for. Now, if we do not mean popup avoided, as you explained, then the changes I proposed are not necessary. I think it's wrong to open popup windows in general, but after all I agree that it'also wrong to set an imperative rule about that because there may be cases where popup can be useful, if well handled by user agent. Anyway, wcag should only point out the problems for users when ua cannot handle them. Maybe a clarifying sentence or an example in the techniques can help someone having the same misunderstanding like the ones that were discussing in Italy. :) Something like stating the reverse issue: "I.e., if ua can handle popup windows, then the authors can use them if necessary, but be careful: popup can always be disorienting for some users". I thought that wasn't needed, but it seems like some foreign language people could benefit. > In last week's techniques telecon discussion of checkpoint 10.1[4], the > initial feeling is that we can not deprecate this checkpoint yet. > Therefore, in essence, we are saying what you would like to see, but with > the hope that someday user agents will handle new windows better (even > better than they do today). Straight thinking. :) Thanks, best Maurizio Boscarol
Received on Monday, 22 December 2003 18:47:48 UTC