- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:42:57 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <00ea01c3b91d$40c5a270$a201a8c0@deque.local>
Ref: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-HTML-TECHS-20031104.html The tech doc has always maintained that "It is rare to use both the caption element and the summary attribute (in a table) since one or the other should be enough to provide a description." Comment: It is a good practice to have captions for all tables as it is like a table heading and is visible to all. But the summary is not displayed on screen and is especially meant to provide additional cues for orientation / navigation to non-sighted users. For complex / large tables and tables that use row/column spanning, useful info can be conveyed through the summary attribute. There are many times when both attributes are complementary to each other and the HTML tech doc should not suggest that it is rare to use both. In fact the doc should suggest that one should make the assessment for each table on a case by case basis. Take for instance even a simple table with 6 columns that lists e-mail messages by rows. Let's say the first column contains a checkbox for selecting messages. It is useful if the captionsays "Sent Messages Folder" and the summary says "Use the checkbox in the first column to select / unselect the message in the respective (or corresponding?) row". I figured this out myself on the MSN-Hotmail site that uses this design. A table caption and summary would make life simpler in this context for instance. I have pointed this out to MSN Support too. Sailesh Panchang Senior Accessibility Engineer Deque Systems,11180 Sunrise Valley Drive, 4th Floor, Reston VA 20191 Tel: 703-225-0380 Extension 105 E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com Fax: 703-225-0387 * Look up <http://www.deque.com> *
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2003 16:34:51 UTC