- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 15:24:47 -0600
- To: "'Alistair Garrison'" <alistair.garrison@accessinmind.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "'Jason White'" <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, "'Judy Brewer'" <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <023301c3b52c$e5f9fce0$77326880@USD320002X>
This is a good and interesting point. It would be good to "migrate' 1.0 toward 2.0 to make later transition easier. However, I don't think we can revise 1.0 using the errata mechanism. I think that can only be used for real mistakes. Judy? Is this correct? Or can we use this to amend the old guidelines? In either case we need to open a discussion on how to assist in harmonization and transition. Thanks. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alistair Garrison Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 10:15 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; Jason White; Gregg Vanderheiden; Judy Brewer Subject: WCAG 1.0 - Errata Update Needed... Dear Jason, Gregg, WAI Content Guidelines Working Group, I would like to ask if the Errata for WCAG 1.0 ( <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WAI-WEBCONTENT-ERRATA> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WAI-WEBCONTENT-ERRATA) could be updated to reflect the changes in guidance so far incorporated into WCAG 2.0 (for example, the fact that the flash rate considered unacceptable for content has changed from a range of 4 to 59 hertz to a new range of 3 to 49 hertz). I am asking this as the Chair person of the EuroAccessibility Consortium's Task Force 3 who's task is to produce a harmonised European approach to evaluating the accessibility of Web content. In order to be as flexible in our approach as possible we are looking to take into account the changes in guidance being suggested in Version 2 of the guidelines, but have the issue that if we do incorporate these changes our approach would then be in breach of the guidance given in WCAG 1.0. We would very much like to see this matter resolved quickly, and would state again that an updated Errata would be most beneficial as everyone could work with the new material in WCAG 2.0 on the official basis that WAI considers it to be an errata to WCAG 1.0. Very Best Regards Alistair Alistair Garrison Chair - Task Force 3 Email: alistair.garrison@accessinmind.com Tel: +44 (0)207 2522746 Website: http://www.euroaccessibility.org/tf3.php <http://www.euroaccessibility.org/> IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, is for the addressee only. It may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If it has come to you in error, please notify the sender immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy, print, distribute or rely on its contents. All e-mails and any attachments are believed, but not warranted, to be virus free. However, all e-mails should be virus checked before being downloaded and we accept no responsibility therefore.
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2003 16:25:20 UTC