- From: lisa seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:23:35 +0200
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <000701c3aeb1$1dc6fb50$ad00000a@patirsrv.patir.com>
Moving on to checkpoint 4.3 - Assure that technologies required to render the content are listed and widely available -- OR -- Use widely available technologies to render content, and list the technologies that are required [level 2 guideline] I am not completely comfortable with the way this is handled. I think interoperability between operating system (such as is inevitable by using w3 technologies - as required by WCAG1.0) needs to be included and should be level one. Alliteratively this section could be removed and put in the introduction to the guidelines, IE: that we have an explanatory text that explains that following these guidelines is only useful when the user, in what ever environment they may be in, can actually make use of the accessible fetchers next point: Something that affects me a a developer of new techniques Technologies and features on the required list are available in at least two independently-developed implementations. (it is preferable that the technologies used for the implementations have been supported for at least one prior version of the software) if the new technologies are server side but the resulting html is widely accessible - I assume that that is OK? Needs to be clear. All the best Lisa Seeman Visit us at the UB <http://www.ubaccess.com/> Access website UB Access - Moving internet accessibility
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 10:24:06 UTC