- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:14:36 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C46A1118E0262B47BD5C202DA2490D1A1DFBD0@MAIL02.austin.utexas.edu>
Plain language version of Guideline 1.6 plus success criteria, benefits, and examples This document contains a series of proposals for a "plain language_ rewording of WCAG 2.0 Checkpoint 1.6 with Success Criteria, Examples, and Benefits This is submitted in partial fulfillment of an action item taken by John Slatin, Katie Haritos-Shay, and Doyle Burnett during a call in late September or early October, to generate a plain-language version of WCAG 2. This message is partial in two ways: (1) It addresses only Guideline (now Principle) 1, Checkpoint (now Guideline) 1.6, and the relevant success criteria, examples, and benefits. Other guidelines, etc., will follow. (2) It is not really "plain language," in the sense that this text has not yet been compared to the 1500-word "special lexicon" used by Voice of America (or other similar lexicons). Thus it's actually best understood as an attempt to simplify and clarify. We're still working on the formal plain language issues, but wanted to put this out to start generating discussion. Items labeled "Current wording" are taken from the September document Reorg 4, available at http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2003/09/reorg4.html <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2003/09/reorg4.html> . This document was current at the time Katie and Doyle and I took on the action item to attempt a plain language version. Of course the proposed rewordings will need to be correlated with later updates. Current wording for Checkpoint 1.6 1.6 [E2] Foreground content is easily differentiable from background for visual default presentations. Proposed wording for Guideline 1.6 1.6 [E2] In default visual presentations, make it easy to distinguish foreground words and images from the background. Current wording for Checkpoint 1.6, SC 1 1. text that is presented over a background color or grayscale has a mechanism that allows the text to be presented in a fashion that has a contrast greater than ______ between text and background color as measured by ______.[ I#344] Proposed wording for Guideline 1.6, SC 1 1. When text is displayed against a background, users can make the contrast between foreground and background greater than ____ as measured by ____. I#344] Current wording for Best Practice Measures for Checkpoint 1.6 1. when text content is presented over a background image or pattern, the text is easily readable when the page is viewed in 256 grayscale. Editorial Note: this item may be moved or updated if the proposal for adding an extended checkpoint on color is accepted. 2. this item should read identically to the required item #2, except that it should say "in default presentation mode." Proposed wording for Best Practice Measures for Guideline 1.6 1. Text that is displayed over a background image or pattern is easy to read on a monitor that supports 256 shades of gray. Editorial Note: this item may be moved or updated if the proposal for adding an extended checkpoint on color is accepted. 2. this item should read identically to the required item #2, except that it should say "in default presentation mode." Editorial Note: The working group is seeking an algorithm that measures contrast in a way that is accurate and testable enough that we could include it in the guidelines. One algorithm, which comes from the Techniques For Accessibility Evaluation And Repair Tools document, is currently under consideration for inclusion in the techniques, but the group has not yet found something that is specific enough to be included at the guidelines level. Current wording for Benefits of Checkpoint 1.6 * Individuals with low vision can easily make out characters in the content even if they don't have the wide field of view or full range of color perception used by fully sighted persons to separate text from background images. Proposed wording for Who benefits from Checkpoint 1.6 (Informative) * Individuals with low vision can easily make out characters in the content even if the individual doesn't have the wide field of view or full range of color perception used by fully sighted persons to separate text from background images. * Individuals with cognitive or attentional disorders who have difficulty separating foreground from background may find it easier to locate important information. [js note: I took the liberty of adding a second group of beneficiaries] Current wording for Examples of Checkpoint 1.6 * Example 1: a background image on a page. A background image and text are arranged so that there is no image behind the text or the image is so faint that the difference between the darkest part of the image and the text (which is dark) meets the standard foreground/background contrast requirements. The image behind the text also does not contain lines that are about the same width as the characters so they do not interfere with character recognition. Proposed wording for Examples of Guideline 1.6 (Informative) * Example 1: a background image on a page. A background image and text are arranged so that there is no image behind the text or the image is so faint that the difference between the text and the darkest part of the image meets the requirements of this checkpoint. The image behind the text does not contain lines that might interfere with character recognition. "Good design is accessible design." Please note our new name and URL! John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ <http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/>
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:14:37 UTC