- From: Tom Croucher <tcroucher@netalleynetworks.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 15:26:16 +0100
- To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I forget to mention the address of the CMU project http://www.captcha.net/ On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 15:18:23 +0100, Tom Croucher <tcroucher@netalleynetworks.com> wrote: > > Captcha stands for "Telling Computers and Humans Apart (Automatically)". > It most commonly involves using an image with warped text in it to > 'verify' that it is a human and not a robot submitting a form on the > internet. However the problem is that currently all the systems rely on > putting a piece of information in form which computers cannot interprete > and asking a human to repeat it back. This is becoming more widely used, > yahoo uses it to verify mail being sent, network solutions use it to stop > third parties piggybacking on their whois lookup system. With spammers > and other service abusers so prevelent the big service providers are keen > to protect themselves but obviously this has impacts on accessibility. > > I spoke to the guys at CMU about some stuff I was interested in with text > based captchas a while back (6mo maybe) and they said they were working > on a text version. This would probably take the form of a question which > is common knowledge or analogic. ie, "If I have five apples and I eat > three. I give one to Bob but Susan gives me two apples, how many apples > do I have?". To which the acceptable answers would be "3", "three", "3 > apples", "three apples". Another example might be like those IQ tests "A > dingy is to ship as a go-cart is to a?". The acceptable answers being > "Car", "Bus", "Lorry" etc. > > The other obvious way to go would be audio, so generate a word in an > audio format or some other sound. So, "What animal makes this sound?" > stuff like that. Which is almost inevitabley easier than finding a way to > generate textual questions which are understandable enough to humans, but > obscure enough to Natural Language Processors and Cognitive engines, > without being so long and convulted they are obnoxious to use. > > Some vague thoughts and possible solutions. I would love to hear ideas > people have on ways we could make this work without the currently > inaccessible images. I think we should insist that if people must use > image Captcha they either also provide audio ones or a phone number that > people can use to a bypass code. > > > Tom >
Received on Saturday, 18 October 2003 10:26:21 UTC