- From: Yvette P. Hoitink <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 21:03:27 +0200
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002001c38e98$06fa3560$7b00a8c0@Adder>
*cheer* My compliments Gregg! What an amazing job you did! I totally love this new proposal. I solves the multiple dimensions problem I mentioned last week and makes it so much easier for people to understand and apply, especially people who have been using WCAG 1. I will go over this proposal more thoroughly before next week's discussion but wanted to let you know asap how much I appreciate your new proposal. It has a "this is it!" feeling about it, not the awkwardness and lost feeling I had in the previous version :-) Yvette Hoitink CEO Heritas, Enschede, The Netherlands -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden Sent: donderdag 9 oktober 2003 19:41 To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: New proposal for WCAG conformance [NOTE: This is posted today for discussion NEXT week. Not for this week. Not sufficient time for people to review. Comments welcome though.] Described here is an alternate way to look at conformance It addresses the following concerns 1 - multiple dimensions of conformance 2 - match to WCAG 1.0 in structure and measures [BBC] I'd reword #2 to say "compatibility with WCAG 1.0 and other WAI guidelines" 3 - ability to both have minimum and advanced ways to address individual guidelines [snip] To see how all this might look, we have posted another reorganization proposal at <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2003/10/reorg5.html> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2003/10/reorg5.html. [snip]
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2003 15:03:40 UTC