- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 20:21:23 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-id: <003d01c38ba8$28480140$046fa8c0@USD320002X>
Apropos of our "write clearly" guideline Gregg TWO BROWN UNIVERSITY E-GOV STUDIES RELEASED In September, Brown University released its annual E-Gov studies on State and Federal and Urban websites in the United States. To test the accessibility of the websites in each of these studies, researchers used two different standards of disability accessibility: compliance with the Priority Level One standard recommended by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and compliance with the legal requirements of Section 508 of the U.S. Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Sites were judged to be either in compliance or not in compliance based on the online "Bobby" test that evaluates disability accessibility. a. STATE AND FEDERAL E-GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES, 2003 The fourth annual e-government study conducted at Brown University finds that most state and federal government websites are written at too high a grade level for average American users. In addition, only about one-third of sites examined satisfied recognized standards for accessibility by users with vision or hearing impairment. This year's study rated 1,603 state sites and 60 major federal sites in terms of online service delivery, privacy, security, and accessibility, among other things. b. U.S. URBAN E-GOVERNMENT, 2003 Most government websites maintained by America's 70 largest cities fail to meet basic disability access standards for the visually and hearing-impaired, according to a new urban e-government study by researchers at Brown University. This year's study analyzed 1,933 sites maintained by city governments. The researchers examined an average of 27.6 websites in each city, including homepages for the Mayor, City Council and major departments and agencies. To view copies of the press release and full report for both studies, access: www.InsidePolitics.org <http://www.InsidePolitics.org <http://www.insidepolitics.org/> >.
Received on Sunday, 5 October 2003 21:24:19 UTC