Re: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology Techniques

I think is best to let the "Core" word, that is also used in a ISO/TS about
accessibility.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lguarino@adobe.com>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:10 AM
Subject: Re: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology
Techniques



I prefer "General Techniques".

Loretta


>
> Issue #285 [1] was discussed at this afternoon's call. We resolved that
the
> name should be changed, but have not settled on what that name should be.
>
> Candidates include:
>
> 1.) Cross-Technology Techniques
> 2.) General Techniques
>
> Please indicate your preference.
>
> -Ben
>
> [1] http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=285
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 16:59:32 UTC