- From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:51:22 -0400 (EDT)
- To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: yoan.simonian@snv.jussieu.fr
> WCAG 1.0 said in 1999 that this attribute is a priority1. ...for images that require it, which are few. > On my own experience, no graphical browser accept the longdesc attribute > for im g or frames. Lynx doesn't accept it too. I assume you mean "Explorer does not accept" when you say "no graphical browser accept." Netscape 7/Mozilla and iCab do. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=229> > Is WAI recommandation is still to use this longdesc attribute or no ? > If yes how can we justify this utilisation ? It's still useful. The fact that Microsoft Internet Explorer does not support it is unpleasant but not decisive. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Author, _Building Accessible Websites_ <http://joeclark.org/access/> | <http://joeclark.org/book/>
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2003 14:51:36 UTC