- From: lisa seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 00:13:03 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Regrets - I can not make it tonight for the call (it is a festival tonight...). My 2 cents - It looks good, well done Wendy. I would find a stronger way to state the "WCAG 2.0 Extended". This is clearly a lot of work, so maybe we should say "WCAG 2.0 Full or Comprehensive" - some word to say this site is just fantastic.... Also any way to state best practices "This site complies to "WCAG 2.0 core" using WCAG 2.0 best practices". All the best Lisa Seeman Visit us at the UB Access website UB Access - Moving internet accessibilty -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Wendy A Chisholm Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:55 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Draft Conformance section for new working draft Attached is a draft for discussion at tomorrow's telecon. -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Sunday, 8 June 2003 03:18:59 UTC