RE: Draft Conformance section for new working draft

Regrets - I can not make it tonight for the call (it is a festival
tonight...).

 My 2 cents - It looks good, well done Wendy. I would find a stronger
way to state the "WCAG 2.0 Extended". This is clearly a lot of work, so
maybe we should say "WCAG 2.0 Full or Comprehensive"  - some word to say
this site is just fantastic....

Also any way to state best practices

"This site complies to "WCAG 2.0 core" using WCAG 2.0 best practices".

All the best
Lisa Seeman

Visit us at the UB Access website
UB Access - Moving internet accessibilty

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Wendy A Chisholm
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:55 AM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Draft Conformance section for new working draft

Attached is a draft for discussion at tomorrow's telecon.

-- 
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
http://www.w3.org/WAI/
/-- 

Received on Sunday, 8 June 2003 03:18:59 UTC