W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 17:27:21 -0500
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-id: <010401c327c3$cda0cf80$096fa8c0@USD320002X>

Thanks John

This is helpful.  

I wonder if our work might fall into the category of "places where passive
might be indicated".  I wonder this because the do-er is the
author/web-site-owner/person responsible or someone --but we've never been
able to say exactly who.   And sometimes it is the author and sometimes it
is the reviewer/certifier.  

So far, all the active versions I could come up and those I saw from others
were either in the wrong form (e.g. imperative instead of declarative) or
they seem to be more complicated or ambiguous (or actually say something
different than intended) than the passive forms we had.  

We have some people who will be taking a pass at this though - so we will
see if we can come up with active sentences that are declarative and that
don't change the meaning of the checkpoints.   As I said, whenever I tried
to do this, I always end up with a complicated sentence or a sentence
without a subject I can define properly.  

So I wonder if passive, declarative will be the simplest to understand for
these types of items.    

(NOTE:  the guidelines are Imperative, and are intended to be such -- with
an implied subject of "you" - which assumes the reader is that author.  I
THINK we are ok on that......)

Thanks for your comments on this.

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of John M Slatin
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:12 AM
To: Lee Roberts; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization

A somewhat eaiser way to think about the distinction between active and
passive voice is to look at the grammatical subject of the verb.  If
something is being done *to* that subject, the sentence is in the
passive voice.  If the (grammatical) subject is *doing* something, then
the sentence is in the active voice.  

Example: "John read his email all morning" is in the active voice.  But
"John's email was read to him" is in passive voice.  "John" is the
grammatical subject of both sentences, but in the first example John is
the actor and in the second Hjohn is being acted upon.

Many people believe that active voice is clearer and easier to
understand.  But it is believed by many people that passive voice is
better used in certain contexts, such as bureaucratic documents for
which responsibility is not wanted by anyone.

Passive constructions are often longer and harder to control...


John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Institute for Technology & Learning
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.ital.utexas.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Roberts [mailto:leeroberts@roserockdesign.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 7:30 pm
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization

Great job pointing this out.  You have a good concept there, however any
connotation of the verb "to be" is passive.  Therefore, the following
verbs and connotations are passive:

will be
have been
has been
had been
can be
could be

Passive verbs are often preceded by helping verbs (is, am, are, were,
was, been) or followed with by.


Active (this is passive because of the verb are)

1-C3   [1.3]  All content and structure are [separate or separable from]

available independently of presentation.

Truly Active Voice
Provided conventions separate the content and structure elements from
the presentation elements.

Active (this is passive because of the verb is)

2-C1   [2.1]   Ensure that all of the functionality is operable at a 
minimum through a keyboard or a keyboard interface.

Truly Active Voice
All functionality operates from the keyboard or through a keyboard type

Active (this is passive because of the verb are)

4-C2   [5.2]   Ensure that technologies relied upon by the content are 
declared and widely available.

Truly Active Voice
The content relies upon declared and widely available technologies.

Each of the adaptations noted above rely upon the active voice of verbs
without the use of "to be" verbs.  "To be" verbs cause ambiguity and
therefore cause passivity in the message relayed through the sentence.
Either the subject acts upon the object in present time or in the past.

Received on Saturday, 31 May 2003 18:29:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:30 UTC