- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 17:29:35 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Some people had asked what the criteria for putting things into CORE vs EXTENDED were for the new organization. The ACTUAL criteria is: - It goes in CORE if the working group decides it goes there. All else goes into Extended. The following are guiding principles that the group is using in the process. But they are not the final determinants. GP1 - the checkpoint doesn't prescribe the default presentation or expression of the content. GP2 - the checkpoint could be applied to all types of content and sites - (we don't want to have a required (core) checkpoint that can't be met by some types of sites or they will not be able to claim any conformance.) - (in some cases we put in exceptions so that the guideline (with the exception) could be met by all. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: Ben Caldwell [mailto:caldwell@trace.wisc.edu] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 5:03 PM To: gv@trace.wisc.edu Subject: criteria for core
Received on Friday, 23 May 2003 18:30:10 UTC