- From: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:55:47 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Regrets for tomorrow.
Any chance we could move the 5.1/5.4 discussion to next week?
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jason White
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 6:05 PM
To: Web Content Guidelines
Thursday, 17 April, 2002, 20:00-21:30 UTC (4 PM US Eastern, 10 PM
France, 6 AM Eastern Australia) on +1-617-761-6200, passcode 9224.
IRC: irc.w3.org:6665, channel #wai-wcag
Agenda
1. The WCAG working group Charter:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2003AprJun/0058.html
We need to prepare a new public working draft of WCAG 2.0, taking
account of those changes which have been made subsequently to the
October 2002 public draft. For this purpose, several issues have been
raised by the editors:
2. Checkpoint 1.2:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2003AprJun/0056.html
3. Conformance: what do we wish to say in this public working draft,
pending resolution of the large issues pertaining to the
conformance scheme? The latest concrete proposal we have that seeks
to clarify the existing scheme is at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2003JanMar/0150.html
4. Overlap between level 2 and 3 success criteria of checkpoint 5.1,
and checkpoint 5.4.
5. Checkpoint 1.5: contrast ratios and requirements.
The editors may be able to post proposals on each of these points before
Thursday's teleconference.
Other issues up for discussion:
6. categorization of guidelines: definitions of types or levels of
conformance.
7. The details of the WCAG 2.0 conformance scheme.
8. A checkpoint mapping and other issues surrounding the relationship
between WCAG 2.0 and WCAG 1.0 conformance schemes.
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2003 17:55:34 UTC