Tuesday, 1 July 2003
Monday, 30 June 2003
Thursday, 26 June 2003
Sunday, 29 June 2003
Saturday, 28 June 2003
Friday, 27 June 2003
- RE: Issue #8: flicker (my action item from WCAG teleconference, June 26, 2003)
- accessiblepages about accessibility
Thursday, 26 June 2003
- Draft WCAG Bugzilla Users Guide
- Re: Issue #8: flicker (my action item from WCAG teleconference, June 26, 2003)
- Issue #8: flicker (my action item from WCAG teleconference, June 26, 2003)
- RE: Submit Event: RE: Automatic submission of forms and screen changes
- Submit Event: RE: Automatic submission of forms and screen changes
- "Techniques for WCAG 2.0 That Apply Across Technologies"
- Re: Automatic submission of forms and screen changes
- RE: Automatic submission of forms and screen changes
- Re: Automatic submission of forms and screen changes
- RE: Automatic submission of forms and screen changes
- RE: Automatic submission of forms and screen changes
- Re: Automatic submission of forms and screen changes
- Re: Automatic submission of forms and screen changes
- REGRETS
- regrets - Gian
- Re: Evaluation and changing pages
- RE: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- Evaluation and changing pages
- Re: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- RE: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- Automatic submission of forms and screen changes
- RE: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- RE: Agenda
Wednesday, 25 June 2003
- RE: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- 19 Jun 2003 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
- 18 Jun 2003 - WCAG WG Techniques Task Force Teleconference Minutes
- RE: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- Re: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- RE: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- Agenda
- Re: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- RE: New TR Draft published
- regrets
Tuesday, 24 June 2003
- Re: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- Re: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- New TR Draft published
- Regrets 25th June teleconference
- regrets
Monday, 23 June 2003
- Request for next Techniques teleconference
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- Re: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
Sunday, 22 June 2003
- Re: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
Saturday, 21 June 2003
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- Re: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
Friday, 20 June 2003
- Re: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- Re: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology Techniques
- Re: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- Re: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- RE: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology Techniques
- RE: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology Techniques
- RE: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology Techniques
- RE: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology Techniques
- RE: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology Techniques
- Techniques vs. best practices
- Re: best practices vs techniques
- Re: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology Techniques
Thursday, 19 June 2003
- best practices vs techniques
- RE: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology Techniques
- Best Practices vs. Techniques
- RE: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology Techniques
- Regrets
- W3C Weekly News - 19 June 2003
- Success criteria for checkpoint 2.2
- Editorial note: definition of non-text content
- regrets
- Call?
- RE: [#293] Summary for tables
- RE: Action item: proposed rewording for Checkpoint 4.2, Criterion 1
- RE: [#248] Table Proposals
- Re: Action item: proposed rewording for Checkpoint 4.2, Criterion 1
- RE: [#248] Table Proposals
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- RE: Action item: proposed rewording for Checkpoint 4.2, Criterion 1
- Regrets
- RE: Action item: proposed rewording for Checkpoint 4.2, Criterion 1
- regrets
Wednesday, 18 June 2003
- RE: [#293] Summary for tables
- RE: [#248] Table Proposals
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- Re: onclick and onkeypress scripting technique issue
- Re: Action item: proposed rewording for Checkpoint 4.2, Criterion 1
- Action item: proposed rewording for Checkpoint 4.2, Criterion 1
- Re: Longdesc attribute for images
- Re: Longdesc attribute for images
- draft agenda for F2F
- Regrets 18th - 19th June teleconference
- 18th - 19th June teleconference
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- 18th - 19th June teleconference
Friday, 13 June 2003
Tuesday, 17 June 2003
Monday, 16 June 2003
- Re: Server-Side Techniques and ATAG (was: How to ... discuss an issue (was: Re: Scripting))
- Server-Side Techniques and ATAG (was: How to ... discuss an issue (was: Re: Scripting))
- 12 Jun 2003 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
- How to get the WCAG WG to discuss an issue (was: Re: Scripting)
Sunday, 15 June 2003
Saturday, 14 June 2003
- Re: Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- Scripting
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- Re: Guidelines for describing pictures and video
Friday, 13 June 2003
- RE: Guidelines for describing pictures and video
- RE: Guidelines for describing pictures and video
- Guidelines for describing pictures and video
- RE: www.w3c.org
- Re: www.w3c.org
- www.w3c.org
- Re: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- [techs] Techniques teleconference 18 June 2003
- [techs] Summary of teleconference 11 June 2003
- [Venice F2F] Hotel Booking
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
Thursday, 12 June 2003
- RE: Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- REGRETS FOR TODAY
- REGRETS FOR TODAY
- Regrets for today
- Re: Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- Re: Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- Re: [#294] Row and column structure in tables
- Re: Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- Re: Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- W3C Weekly News - 12 June 2003
- RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
Wednesday, 11 June 2003
- Re: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- RE: Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- RE: Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- Re: Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- Test another application for teleconference: it works :)
- RE: [#293] Summary for tables
- Re: [#248] Table Proposals
- RE: [#293] Summary for tables
- RE: [#293] Summary for tables
- Re: Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- RE: Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- agenda
- Re: [#293] Summary for tables
Tuesday, 10 June 2003
- 10 June Internal Working Draft Posted
- [techs] Techniques teleconference 04 June 2003
- RE: [12] Use of headings
- RE: [12] Use of headings
- Re: Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- Re: [#293] Summary for tables
- RE: [12] Use of headings
- RE: [12] Use of headings
- RE: [#293] Summary for tables
- F2F in Venice: Wireless connection
- Re: [#293] Summary for tables
- RE: [#293] Summary for tables
- Please review: Updated draft of conformance section for next draft
- F2F reminder: book hotel before 10 June, register before 24 June
Monday, 9 June 2003
- Re: [#293] Summary for tables
- RE: what is active RE: passive vs active voice
- RE: [#293] Summary for tables
- RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- RE: what is active RE: passive vs active voice
- what is active RE: passive vs active voice
Sunday, 8 June 2003
Saturday, 7 June 2003
- RE: [12] Use of headings
- Re: New mailing list on web testing by visually impaired users
- New mailing list on web testing by visually impaired users
- RE: [12] Use of headings
- RE: [12] Use of headings
- New mailing list on web testing by visually impaired users
- 05 Jun 2003 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Friday, 6 June 2003
- Re: [#293] Summary for tables
- RE: [#293] Summary for tables
- RE: [#293] Summary for tables
- RE: [12] Use of headings
- Re: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- RE: [12] Use of headings
- RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- [#293] Summary for tables
- RE: [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- [#294] Row and column structure in tables
- Re: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- [#248] Table Proposals
- [12] Use of headings
- [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets
- [171] accessible rebroadcasts
- [196] How make pop-up menus accessible?
- RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- RE: Introduction
- RE: Introduction
Thursday, 5 June 2003
- Re: Avoid deprecated features query
- RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- Introduction
- regrets
- RE: Avoid deprecated features query
- regrets
- RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- Re: Bugzilla URLs
- Bugzilla URLs
- RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- Subject: RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- active vs passive
- Re: Agenda - Late Regrets
- Re: Erratum proposal
- Re: Ideas for CSS 3.0?
- RE: Avoid deprecated features query
- [techs] Summary of teleconference 4 June 2003
- RE: Erratum proposal (was: Re: Avoid deprecated features query)
- Re: Erratum proposal (was: Re: Avoid deprecated features query)
- Erratum proposal (was: Re: Avoid deprecated features query)
- 29 May 2003 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
- Re: Avoid deprecated features query
- RE: Avoid deprecated features query
Wednesday, 4 June 2003
- RE: Avoid deprecated features query
- RE: [#248] Data and layout tables: identifying and marking
- RE: [#248] Data and layout tables: identifying and marking
- Re: Avoid deprecated features query
- RE: Avoid deprecated features query
- Re: Avoid deprecated features query
- [techs] GEO outline (and other) documentation
- Draft Conformance section for new working draft
- Re: [#248] Data and layout tables: identifying and marking
- [#248] Data and layout tables: identifying and marking
- Avoid deprecated features query
- Re: [techs] Techniques teleconference 04 June 2003
- Re: Agenda
- Agenda
Tuesday, 3 June 2003
- regrets
- Re: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- Regrets for this week
- RE: Data and layout tables: examples
- RE: [techs] Techniques teleconference 04 June 2003
- Re: Data and layout tables: examples
- [techs] Techniques teleconference 04 June 2003
- RE: Data and layout tables: examples
- Re: Data and layout tables: examples
- Re: Data and layout tables: definition
- Data and layout tables: examples
- Re: [#227] Explicitly state the versions of X/HTML a technique works with
Monday, 2 June 2003
- [#227] Explicitly state the versions of X/HTML a technique works with
- [techs] updated dtd and test file
- W3C Weekly News - 3 June 2003
- RE: Data and layout tables: definition
- Re: Data and layout tables: definition
- Re: Data and layout tables: definition
- [Techs] GEO document layering
- Data and layout tables: definition
Sunday, 1 June 2003
Saturday, 31 May 2003
Friday, 30 May 2003
- RE: [#248] Data and layout tables: identifying and marking
- Writing for the Web
- RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- Re: Errata, Updates, and Second Editions (was: [#259] Proposal: remove default form text requirements)
- Errata, Updates, and Second Editions (was: [#259] Proposal: remove default form text requirements)
- Re: [#248] Data and layout tables: identifying and marking
- [#259] Erratum wording - placeholder text
- RE: [#259] Proposal: remove default form text requirements
- RE: [#179] Meta "location" redirect
- RE: [#248] Data and layout tables: identifying and marking
- Belated regrets
- FW: first review
- regrets
- RE: passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
Thursday, 29 May 2003
- Criteria for placing items in success criteria vs. best practice
- [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology Techniques
- passive vs active voice in May 9 Proposed reorganization
- Regrets
- Agenda - REGRETS
- Re: Agenda (Regrets for 29 May, 2003)
- [#248] Data and layout tables: identifying and marking
- RE: [#179] Meta "location" redirect
- Potiential Criteria for placing items in success criteria vs. best practice
- Unable to participate in conference call
- Agenda
Wednesday, 28 May 2003
- [#256] CSS to hide Client Side Image Maps?
- Re: [#179] Meta "location" redirect
- Re: [#179] Meta "location" redirect
- Re: [#179] Meta "location" redirect
- [#179] Meta "location" redirect
Tuesday, 27 May 2003
- [B259] Proposal: remove default form text requirements
- [techs] Techniques teleconference 28 May 2003
Sunday, 25 May 2003
Saturday, 24 May 2003
- <!-- h2> conspiracy theory? </table -->
- [techs] Proposal: delete section on using object instead of frames
Friday, 23 May 2003
Thursday, 22 May 2003
- Re: Table Techniques - Layout (Bug 248)
- Re: Table Techniques - Layout (Bug 248)
- Regrets for today
- Re: Table Techniques - Layout (Bug 248)
- Agenda
- first review
- first review
- Re: Agenda
- window.print() [script-techs]
Wednesday, 21 May 2003
Tuesday, 20 May 2003
Monday, 19 May 2003
Saturday, 17 May 2003
Friday, 16 May 2003
- RE: Definition of "content" and related terms
- Re: may 15 minutes
- Re: may 15 minutes
- Re: may 15 minutes
- Re: Greetings and introduction
- may 15 minutes
Thursday, 15 May 2003
- Re: Agenda
- Regrets
- New draft
- Use of the word "content" in WCAG 2.0
- Agenda
- Definition of "content" and related terms
- Re: Agenda - Regrets
Wednesday, 14 May 2003
Tuesday, 13 May 2003
Monday, 12 May 2003
- FW: National Federation of the Blind Certifies eBusiness Leaders HP, Wells Fargo and the U.S. Social Security Administration for Web Accessibility
- Edits to May 9 Reformulation Proposal
Saturday, 10 May 2003
Friday, 9 May 2003
- Updated Reformulation Proposal
- Greetings and introduction
- 08 May Minutes Posted
- WCAG20 Definition of Content from May 8 2005 Telecon
Thursday, 8 May 2003
- action item
- late regrets
- RE: Agenda - regrets and additional info
- 1 and 2 July F2F meeting information and registration
- 01 May 2003 WCAG WG Minutes
- charter
- RE: Agenda - regrets and additional info
- Re: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines - Reformulation (TAKE 6)
- Agenda
Wednesday, 7 May 2003
- Regrets for May 8
- Proposed definition of content
- Re: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 07 May 2003
- Re: regrets for 8, 15, 22 May. Need volunteers to take minutes
- regrets for 8, 15, 22 May. Need volunteers to take minutes
Tuesday, 6 May 2003
- [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 07 May 2003
- W3C Weekly News - 6 May 2003
- Version of the Reorg with OLD success criteria redistributed.
Sunday, 4 May 2003
- Re: Alternative definition of "Web site"
- Re: Alternative definition of "Web site"
- Re: Alternative definition of "Web site"
Saturday, 3 May 2003
Friday, 2 May 2003
- Web Content Accessibility Guidelines - Reformulation (TAKE 6)
- [techs] template and place-holder for documentation
Thursday, 1 May 2003
- Alternative definition of "Web site"
- FW: Comments on new Working Draft - Guideline 4 & 5
- Re: Agenda
- Re: Accessible e-learning
- Comments on new Working Draft - Guideline 4 & 5
- Comments on new Working Draft - Guideline 3
- Comments on new Working Draft - Guideline 2
- RE: Agenda
- Agenda
Wednesday, 30 April 2003
- Re: Accessible e-learning
- Re: Accessible e-learning
- [techs] Summary of teleconference 30 April 2003
- WCAG Definitions Discussed at CSUN 2003
- Accessible e-learning
- Comments on new Working Draft - Guideline 1
- Re: WCAG20 Comments 20030429 Draft
- Re: WCAG20 Comments 20030429 Draft
Tuesday, 29 April 2003
- Re: WCAG20 Comments 20030429 Draft
- WCAG20 Comments 20030429 Draft
- [techs] Techniques teleconference 30 April 2003
- REGRETS for this coming Thursday
- New WCAG 2.0 Working Draft Published to TR
- April 29 Working Draft published to TR
Sunday, 27 April 2003
Friday, 25 April 2003
- RE: Pew Internet & American Life Project
- Re: Pew Internet & American Life Project
- 24 Apr 2003 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
- FW: Take 5 - Proposal for Definitions and conformance GROUPS
Thursday, 24 April 2003
- Color contrast sites
- Background images
- Re: Agenda
- Re: Backgrounds and Accessibility
- Notes from March 23/24 Face-to-Face in Los Angeles
- Re: Backgrounds and Accessibility
- Re: Backgrounds and Accessibility
- Agenda
Wednesday, 23 April 2003
Tuesday, 22 April 2003
Monday, 21 April 2003
- Backgrounds
- Backgrounds and Accessibility
- Re: Action Item - Background sounds
- Re: Action Item - Background sounds
Sunday, 20 April 2003
- Re: Action Item - Background sounds
- Re: Action Item - Background sounds
- Re: Error in http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/
- Re: Error in http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/
- Re: Error in http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/
Saturday, 19 April 2003
- Re: Error in http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/
- Error in http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/
- Re: Error in http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/
- Error in http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/
- 18 April 2003 (internal) Working Draft of WCAG 2.0
Friday, 18 April 2003
Thursday, 17 April 2003
- Action ITem - Background sounds
- Re: Agenda
- Re: Agenda
- Checkpoint 1.5 Proposal
- Conformance: Draft text for next TR Working Draft
Wednesday, 16 April 2003
Tuesday, 15 April 2003
- [techs] Techniques teleconference 16 April 2003
- Checkpoint 1.2 Proposal for Review
- RE: Take 4 - Proposal for Definitions and coformance (with just 2 Levels)
- regrets
- Re: Take 4 - Proposal for Definitions and coformance (with just 2 Levels)
- Re: Take 4 - Proposal for Definitions and coformance (with just 2 Levels)
- Re: d-link International
- Re: d-link International
Monday, 14 April 2003
- Re: Take 4 - Proposal for Definitions and coformance (with just 2 Levels)
- d-link International
- Re: Take 4 - Proposal for Definitions and coformance (with just 2 Levels)
- Re: A proposal for a new item in the list of Checkpoint 4.1
Sunday, 13 April 2003
Friday, 11 April 2003
- [techs] Summary of teleconference 09 April 2003
- Re: Mapping HTML Techniques for WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
- Mapping HTML Techniques for WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
- Re: User Agent Content Question
- Re: User Agent Content Question
- User Agent Content Question
- Concise meeting summary
- Take 4 - Proposal for Definitions and coformance (with just 2 Levels)
Thursday, 10 April 2003
- Demo for the Agenda
- Re: Please Review: Draft Charter
- Please Read: Teleconference tips, tricks, and tools
- Please Review: Draft Charter
- Re: Agenda
Wednesday, 9 April 2003
Sunday, 9 March 2003
Wednesday, 9 April 2003
Tuesday, 8 April 2003
- [techs] Correction - Techniques teleconference 9 April 2003
- Please vote: dates for next F2F
- Alternative Interfaces for Accessibility
Monday, 7 April 2003
- [techs] Techniques teleconference 9 April 2003
- [test-suite] Fwd: draft accessibility testing technical document
Sunday, 6 April 2003
Friday, 4 April 2003
Thursday, 3 April 2003
- Re: Agenda
- RE: Agenda
- Re: Agenda
- [techs] Summary of teleconference 02 April 2003
- Re: Post #1 of Proposal for a REstructuring and ReOrienting the WCAG 2.0 Guidelines
- Re: Post #1 of Proposal for a REstructuring and ReOrienting the WCAG 2.0 Guidelines
Wednesday, 2 April 2003
- Agenda
- Re: [Buttons] Alternative W3C buttons.
- Re: Notes on new take on Web Access and Guidelines
- Re: [Buttons] Alternative W3C buttons.
- Re: [Buttons] Alternative W3C buttons.
- [Buttons] Alternative W3C buttons.
Tuesday, 1 April 2003
- Re: Post #1 of Proposal for a REstructuring and ReOrienting the WCAG 2.0 Guidelines
- Post #1 of Proposal for a REstructuring and ReOrienting the WCAG 2.0 Guidelines
- RE: Notes on new take on Web Access and Guidelines
- Re: [techs] Techniques teleconference 2 April 2003
- Re: [techs] Techniques teleconference 2 April 2003