Monday, 30 September 2002
- RE: Request for Review: WCAG 2.0 Working Draft
- Re: Access Key (and proposed HTML4 erratum)
- RE: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- [Fwd: Please Review: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Working Draft]
- Re: Access Key
- Re: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
Sunday, 29 September 2002
- Re: Comment on WCAG 2.0: Scaling and stylizing text
- Re: Comment on WCAG 2.0: Scaling and stylizing text
Saturday, 28 September 2002
- Re: Access Key (and proposed HTML4 erratum)
- Regrets for next Thursday
- Regrets for next two Thursdays
Friday, 27 September 2002
- Re: Request for Review: WCAG 2.0 Working Draft
- 26 Sep 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
- Re: Access Key (and proposed HTML4 erratum)
- Re: Comment on WCAG 2.0: Scaling and stylizing text
- Re: Access Key
- Re: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios + 2 questions
- Re: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- Re: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- Re: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios + 2 questions
- Access Key
- RE: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
Thursday, 26 September 2002
- Partial Regrets (leaving early)
- Re: Agenda
- Re: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- RE: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- Re: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- RE: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- RE: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- Agenda
- Re: WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
Wednesday, 25 September 2002
- WCAG 2.0 usage scenarios
- Re: Request for Review: WCAG 2.0 Working Draft
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 26 August 2002
Tuesday, 24 September 2002
Monday, 23 September 2002
Sunday, 22 September 2002
Friday, 20 September 2002
- Fwd: Making Online Learning Accessible- Guidelines Released
- 19 Sep 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Thursday, 19 September 2002
Wednesday, 18 September 2002
Tuesday, 17 September 2002
- Re: 4.1 reproposed
- W3C Weekly News - 16 September 2002
- Re: Reduced Hebrew Vowel Set
- RE: 4.1 reproposed
- Reduced Hebrew Vowel Set
Monday, 16 September 2002
Sunday, 15 September 2002
Thursday, 12 September 2002
- 12 Sep 2002 - WCAG WG and DIWG Joint Teleconference Minutes
- QA Framework: Specification Guidelines
- Regrets for today (no note enclosed)
- Regrets for today (no note enclosed)
- RE: 1.2: proposed rewording
- Re: WCAG/DI joint teleconference: agenda
- RE: WCAG/DI joint teleconference: agenda
- RE: WCAG/DI joint teleconference: agenda
- RE: 1.2: proposed rewording
- RE: 1.2: proposed rewording
- RE: WCAG/DI joint teleconference: agenda
- WCAG/DI joint teleconference: agenda
Wednesday, 11 September 2002
Tuesday, 10 September 2002
- W3C Weekly News - 10 September 2002
- Checkpoints of WCAG 2.0 public working draft relevant to device independence
Monday, 9 September 2002
Friday, 6 September 2002
Thursday, 5 September 2002
- 1.2: proposed rewording
- Regrets
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Re: Agenda (URI correction)
- Partial regrets
- RE: Action item: new wording for Checkpoint 5.2 minimum success c riterion #1
- RE: Action item: new wording for Checkpoint 5.2 minimum success c riterion #1
- Re: 1.6 revisited
- RE: Action item: new wording for Checkpoint 5.2 minimum success criterion #1
- Re: 5.4: proposal re level 2 success criteria
- RE: Agenda
- RE: Agenda
- Re: 1.2: Example 2
- Re: 5.4: proposal re level 2 success criteria
- Agenda
Wednesday, 4 September 2002
- 1.2: Example 2
- 5.4: proposal re level 2 success criteria
- Re: Technology-specific checklists
- RE: Technology-specific checklists
- Re: Technology-specific checklists
- RE: Technology-specific checklists
- 1.6 revisited
- Action item: new wording for Checkpoint 5.2 minimum success crite rion #1
- RE: RE: update on Hebrew and Arabic
- Re: Technology-specific checklists
- Fwd: RE: update on hebrew and arabic
- Please review: device-independence and authoring scenarios documents
- Technology-specific checklists
Tuesday, 3 September 2002
Monday, 2 September 2002
Sunday, 1 September 2002
Saturday, 31 August 2002
Friday, 30 August 2002
Saturday, 31 August 2002
Friday, 30 August 2002
- RE: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- RE: fancy talk about "plain language" [was: RE: Proposed 4.1 wo rding ...]
- Re: Action item - claiming conformance at Level 2 or 3
- Action item - claiming conformance at Level 2 or 3
- RE: minutes from today's meeting
Thursday, 29 August 2002
- RE: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- minutes from today's meeting
- RE: Agenda
- Re: Agenda
- RE: fancy talk about "plain language" [was: RE: Proposed 4.1 wo rding ...]
- RE: fancy talk about "plain language" [was: RE: Proposed 4.1 wo rding ...]
- RE: fancy talk about "plain language" [was: RE: Proposed 4.1 wo rding ...]
- RE: fancy talk about "plain language" [was: RE: Proposed 4.1 wording ...]
- fancy talk about "plain language" [was: RE: Proposed 4.1 wording ...]
- RE: Proposed 4.1 wording for discussion and new proposal
- RE: Proposed 4.1 wording for discussion
- Re: Agenda
- RE: Agenda
- Volunteer required to take minutes at this week's meeting
- Re: Agenda
- Re: Agenda
- Re: REMOVAL OF ITEM 3.1 BECAUSE IT IS COVERED BY A 1.3 AND 4.1
- RE: Agenda
- RE: Proposed 4.1 wording for discussion and new proposal
- Agenda
Wednesday, 28 August 2002
- RE: 1.3 provision (was in 3.1)
- RE: 1.3 provision (was in 3.1)
- RE: Comments on WCAG 2.0
- Comments on WCAG 2.0
- RE: 1.3 provision (was in 3.1)
- 1.3 provision (was in 3.1)
- REMOVAL OF ITEM 3.1 BECAUSE IT IS COVERED BY A 1.3 AND 4.1
- Re: FW: Hebrew screen readers
- New internal working draft available
- background to last email
- FW: Hebrew screen readers
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
Tuesday, 27 August 2002
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- RE: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- RE: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion
- Nakdan
Monday, 26 August 2002
- Re: Moving Checkpoint 3.2 to Guideline 1 to Become New 1.4
- Re: Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 - Deaf/Hard of Hearing Consumers
- Moving Checkpoint 3.2 to Guideline 1 to Become New 1.4
- Re: comment on 29 August meeting
- Re: comment on 29 August meeting
Sunday, 25 August 2002
Friday, 23 August 2002
- RE: 22 Aug 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
- RE: 4.1 success criteria - proposal for division
- RE: 4.1 success criteria - proposal for division
- Personal presentation
- Re: 22 Aug 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Saturday, 24 August 2002
Thursday, 22 August 2002
- Agenda
- Regrets
- regrets for 29 August meeting
- 22 Aug 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
- Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 - Deaf/Hard of Hearing Consumers
- RE: 4.1 success criteria - proposal for division
- Regrets (sorry for the late notice!)
- Agenda
- Re: 4.1 success criteria - proposal for division
- fyi: new draft published
- RE: Regrets for Thursday, Aug 22
- Regrets for Thursday, Aug 22
- Re: 4.1 success criteria - proposal for division
- RE: 4.1 success criteria - proposal for division
- 4.1 success criteria - proposal for division
- RE: Regrets for Thursday, Aug 22
Wednesday, 21 August 2002
Thursday, 22 August 2002
Wednesday, 21 August 2002
- Re: Checkpoint 9.3
- RE: Proposed 4.1 wording for discussion and new proposal
- Re: Proposed 4.1 wording for discussion
- Re: Proposed 4.1 wording for discussion
- Proposed 4.1 wording for discussion and new proposal
- Re: EARL Re: use PICS for accessibility?
- Re: use PICS for accessibility?
- RE: Regrets for Thursday, Aug 22
- Re: Checkpoint 9.3
- Vowels
Tuesday, 20 August 2002
Monday, 19 August 2002
- EARL Re: use PICS for accessibility?
- Re: use PICS for accessibility?
- Re: IRC and teleconferences...
- Re: IRC and teleconferences...
- Re: IRC and teleconferences...
- IRC and teleconferences...
- Re: Regrets for Thursday, Aug 22
- Re: Regrets for Thursday, Aug 22
- Re: Regrets for Thursday, Aug 22
- Regrets for Thursday, Aug 22
- minutes from Aug 15, 2002 teleconference
- Re: use PICS for accessibility?
- Re: use PICS for accessibility?
- Re: use PICS for accessibility?
- use PICS for accessibility?
- Re: New participant Intros and tours
- Re: New participant Intros and tours
- and more infor on Voewls
Sunday, 18 August 2002
Saturday, 17 August 2002
Friday, 16 August 2002
Thursday, 15 August 2002
Wednesday, 14 August 2002
- Re: New participant Intros and tours
- Re: New participant Intros and tours
- Re: New participant Intros and tours
- Reach-Out CRM Distribution Opportunity
Tuesday, 13 August 2002
- New participant Intros and tours
- [HTML techs] Tables - to do's. Volunteers?
- Minutes from 1 August 2002 telecon (thanks Andi!)
- W3C Weekly News - 12 August 2002
Monday, 12 August 2002
Friday, 9 August 2002
Thursday, 8 August 2002
- 08 Aug 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- Re: Regrets
- RE: Agenda
- Re: Regrets
- Regrets
- RE: What determines what goes in level 1, 2, 3 etc as success criteria
- RE: Agenda
Wednesday, 7 August 2002
- RE: auto set focus and accessibility
- August 7 Draft Available for Review
- RE: Agenda
- RE: What determines what goes in level 1, 2, 3 etc as success cri teria
- Re: What determines what goes in level 1, 2, 3 etc as success criteria
- Agenda
- RE: What determines what goes in level 1, 2, 3 etc as success criteria
- crieria for Success criteria.
- What determines what goes in level 1, 2, 3 etc as success criteria
Tuesday, 6 August 2002
- Re: auto set focus and accessibility
- RE: auto set focus and accessibility
- RE: auto set focus and accessibility
- auto set focus and accessibility
- Accessible Art Online at Tage Gallery
- W3C Weekly News - 5 August 2002
- Fwd: Device Independence workshop + document
Monday, 5 August 2002
Saturday, 3 August 2002
Friday, 2 August 2002
Thursday, 1 August 2002
Wednesday, 31 July 2002
- regrets, need minute taker for this week's call
- Regrets
- regrets
- User Agent profiles (related to checkpoints 5.2 and 5.4)
- RE: Checkpoint 5.2, level 2 success criteria
- Re: Checkpoint 5.2, level 2 success criteria
- Agenda
Tuesday, 30 July 2002
Monday, 29 July 2002
Sunday, 28 July 2002
- Interesting feedback
- Re: Checkpoint 5.2, level 2 success criteria
- Re: Checkpoint 5.2, level 2 success criteria
Saturday, 27 July 2002
Friday, 26 July 2002
- [Core Techniques] Quick review and ideas
- Fwd: WWW2003 Budapest, Hungary - Call for Papers
- Checkpoint 5.2, level 2 success criteria
Thursday, 25 July 2002
Tuesday, 23 July 2002
- flash-navigation and sound-onmouseover
- RE: illustrating content - tables of figures
- RE: illustrating content - tables of figures
- illustrating content - tables of figures
- Hi All --- reminder - please post issues for the issue log or suggested wording or items
- W3C Weekly News - 22 July 2002
Monday, 22 July 2002
- Re: ftf in Linz success criteria
- Re: ftf in Linz success criteria
- Re: scripting and f2f
- Re: scripting and f2f
- RE: ftf in Linz success criteria
- Re: ftf in Linz success criteria
Sunday, 21 July 2002
- Re: ftf in Linz success criteria
- Re: ftf in Linz success criteria
- RE: ftf in Linz success criteria
- RE: ftf in Linz success criteria
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- "Internet standards can no longer be written by technology firms alone" By line from Economist 20/7/02 pg 54
- Re: ftf in Linz success criteria
- Re: ftf in Linz success criteria
Friday, 19 July 2002
Thursday, 18 July 2002
- FW: 4.1 Ideas Compilation
- AUWG WCAG 2.0 Update Synopsis
- [Script-Techniques] SVG jigsaw.
- 4.1 Ideas Compilation
- Minutes from 15/16 July WCAG WG F2F
- No meeting planned this week
Wednesday, 17 July 2002
- RE: ftf in Linz success criteria
- RE: "Wide applicability" was Trying to better explain concern about mappingtechnology-specificsto success criteria
- RE: ftf in Linz success criteria
- RE: "Wide applicability" was Trying to better explain concern about mappingtechnology-specificsto success criteria
Tuesday, 16 July 2002
- summary of ftf work on 4.1
- Re: ftf in Linz success criteria
- ftf in Linz success criteria
- RE: Trying to better explain concern about mappingtechnology-specificsto success criteria
- "Wide applicability" was Trying to better explain concern about mappingtechnology-specificsto success criteria
- Re: "Fewer than half the world"
- "Fewer than half the world"
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: Trying to better explain concern about mappingtechnology-specificsto success criteria
Monday, 15 July 2002
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- FW: compatibility
- Live picture from Linz
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: Trying to better explain concern about mappingtechnology-specifics to success criteria
- Re: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- Re: Trying to better explain concern about mapping technology-specifics to success criteria
- RE: Trying to better explain concern about mappingtechnology-specifics to success criteria
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
Sunday, 14 July 2002
Friday, 12 July 2002
Saturday, 13 July 2002
- Re: Trying to better explain concern about mapping technology-specifics to success criteria
- Re: Trying to better explain concern about mapping technology-specifics to success criteria
Friday, 12 July 2002
- Trying to better explain concern about mapping technology-specifics to success criteria
- RE: magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- RE: 4.1 Rev for TR release
- magnifiers vs relative font-sizes
- find the news you want on the radio?
- Re: 4.1 Rev for TR release
- criminally insane?, of sound and section 508
- 4.1 Rev for TR release
Thursday, 11 July 2002
- 11 Jul 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
- Re: Agenda
- Re: CSS: @media handheld ...]
- It is with trust and confidence that I make this proposal to you.
- 2 changes to agenda for F2F next week
- RE: Detailed agenda for F2F meeting, updates to ETA
- CSS: @media handheld { IMG { display:none } }
- RE: Checkpoint 2.3 Avoid causing the screen to flicker - Test?
- RE: Agenda
- Agenda
Wednesday, 10 July 2002
- RE: Checkpoint 2.3 Avoid causing the screen to flicker - Test?
- Detailed agenda for F2F meeting, updates to ETA
- WWAAC trip report and link to outline of techniques to make content easier to understand
- W3C Weekly News - 9 July 2002