RE: new draft is up

Hi Lisa,

 

I took a closer look at this when I got in this morning and you're
absolutely right. I've updated the draft to include the [appropriate |
possible] language and revised the Reviewers note at the end of the
checkpoint to reflect the fact that this checkpoint is still incomplete.


 

Thanks for catching this,

 

-Ben 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Lisa Seeman
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:04 AM
To: 'Ben Caldwell'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: new draft is up

 

sorry if I am being thick. I quoted the wrong meeting, - i meant
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2002/06/06-minutes.html

 

but i see on the minutes there:

 

GV The 4.1 checkpoint be a rendition of "write as clearly and simply as
[appropriate | possible] for content." Not talk about audience. Then no
success criteria levels. provide a partial list of ideas and a note
about it being under development.

JS Maybe be a bit further and say that the list will be broken out into
different conformance levels. Give some indication of what might happen
to them.

then there is consensus taking.

followed by a slight change in wording to:

 

"write as simply as [appropriate | possible] for the purpose of the
content." 

 

 

 

Thanks,

Lisa

 -----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Ben Caldwell
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:43 AM
To: 'Lisa Seeman'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: new draft is up

Hi Lisa,

 

According to the minutes from June 6th
(http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2002/06/06-minutes.html), there were no
objections to moving forward with publication on this checkpoint. 

 

As indicated in the reviewer's note at the end of checkpoint 4.1 in the
new draft, there is an outstanding action item for Gregg and I to
compile a list of ideas related to 4.1. This list will serve as a basis
for future discussion related to evolving this checkpoint.

 

-Ben

 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Lisa Seeman
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:28 AM
To: 'Ben Caldwell'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: new draft is up

 

I still do not see the results from the call on 4.1 from  the Minutes
from May 30 Teleconference

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Ben Caldwell
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:02 AM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: new draft is up

Hi, 

 

I just posted a new working draft for WCAG 2 that reflects the evolution
of the document since the April 24 draft. Please let us know if you spot
any errors, omissions or other items to be addressed so that we can
incorporate them before the draft moves on to publication on the W3C's
Technical Reports page, and subsequent public review.

 

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20020626.html

 

Thanks,

 

-Ben

--
Ben Caldwell |  <mailto:caldwell@trace.wisc.edu> caldwell@trace.wisc.edu
Trace Research and Development Center (http://trace.wisc.edu)   

 

 

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/13/02

 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/13/02

 

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/13/02


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/13/02