- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 20:10:07 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
- cc: <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
My suggestion was that we collect the things that have been proposed, and
work out if we can use them as success criteria - i.e. if they can be written
to be testable and true.
I suspect in some cases there will be different criteria for different
languages.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU]
Here are some of the comments I found in recent posts that I
think we should grab and hold. They are the suggestions I could find
in the discourse. And suggestions is what we need to work from.
[snip]
From Charles
[snip]
One of the suggested success criteria from the meeting in
Melbourne was that the appropriate terms be used.
Most of the suggestions have been to do with ways of writing a
sentence or a paragraph. They are very similar to the suggestions we
seem to accept of ways to structure a page or a collection of pages
{GV NOTE: I think he is saying that we should start collecting
some of the ADVICE items not as success criteria but as the list of
things you can do and should consider --- just as we did for structure
etc. Is that right Charles? - or did I miss it.}
Received on Monday, 10 June 2002 20:10:10 UTC