- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 12:15:48 -0400 (EDT)
- To: jonathan chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- cc: john_slatin <john_slatin@forum.utexas.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I think we are in flaming agreement... chaals On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, jonathan chetwynd wrote: Please think again Charles*, you're mind may be clouded by what is apparently do-able, and the needs of endless mindless beauracrats. Ancient truths are ancient because they are great if not immutable, unlike timetables. Incest, Patricide, Abuse are topics of our time and theirs, ones which "need to be understood in approximately the same way by a large group of people" Please take the time to view: http://www.respond.org.uk/help/index.html which is a valuable contribution, using a variety of materials efficiently, to discuss a difficult issue, effectively. Accessibility of art is an issue to be confronted, not dismissed lightly. thanks jonathan Charles wrote: I didn't suggest that art is less important than a bus timetable. Just that bus timetables need to be understood in approximately the same way by a large group of people. -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Sunday, 9 June 2002 12:15:49 UTC