- From: jonathan chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 07:29:35 +0100
- To: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- CC: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I have to agree with Lisa, the present guideline 4.1[3.3] offensive in part.
there is no mention of peer review, which is the standard and recognised 
method for assessment.
please find below an edited version:
      Checkpoint 4.1 [3.3] Write as clearly and simply as is possible.
        Success criteria
          You will have successfully met Checkpoint 4.1 at the Minimum
          Level if:
   1. Content is written as clearly and simply as the author feels is
      possible*
          You will have successfully met Checkpoint 4.1 at Level 2 if:
   1. Summaries and/or simpler versions are provided for key pages or
      sections of the site.
          You will have successfully met Checkpoint 4.1 at Level 3 if:
    * Your content is checked for comprehension, by users with a broad
      range of ability
please accept my apologies if I have not been as attentive as required.
thanks
jonathan
*unsuitable copyright material should be linked to, rather than included.
Received on Friday, 31 May 2002 02:40:08 UTC