- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 09:07:02 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Well, I think there are sites that should not be able to claim conformance because they are not accessible. Certain types of artworks )including graphic arts, music, and some kinds of literature) are not going to be accessible. We should be clear that sites in general should attempt all checkpoints at all levels, since many of them will provide benefits to some group even without providing general accessibility. An implication of this is we need to identify any checkpoints that depend on others to be useful - Gian (I think) did this at the Melbourne Face to face meeting. Cheers Charles -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Friday, 17 May 2002 09:07:02 UTC