RE: New SHORT TITLES. POSTED TO LIST FOR COMMENT ---ROBUST

How about 'Technically robust"

Gian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: GV [mailto:GV@trace.wisc.edu]
> Sent: Sunday, 28 April 2002 2:02 PM
> To: w3c-wai-gl
> Subject: RE: New SHORT TITLES. POSTED TO LIST FOR COMMENT ---ROBUST
> 
> 
> Since "Technology Robust" just leaves people scratching their heads --
> how about we just go with ROBUST for now -- and use the full title to
> describe what type of ROBUST we mean.  (maybe we will find other types
> of Robustness we want to put in there anyway.
> 
> That also gives us a complete set of one word items
> 
>  Anyone with any other ideas, keep posting them.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
>  
> 
> Gregg
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
> Ind Engr - Biomed - Trace,  Univ of Wis
> gv@trace.wisc.edu
> 
>  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   Perceivable
> > 
> >   Operable
> > 
> >   Navigable
> > 
> >   Understandable
> > 
> >   Robust
> 
> 
> 
>