- From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@mi.madritel.es>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:20:19 +0200
- To: <GV@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I like version 4. regards, Emmanuelle ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <GV@trace.wisc.edu> To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:59 AM Subject: RE: VOTE > Loretta's rewrite seems to capture nicely the objectives of the previous > versions. > > Please comment on this wording. > Also, if you like the others better - please comment. > > Gregg > > > Loretta wrote > > After considering the 3 alternatives, I'm proposing ALTERNATE 4: > > WCAG 2.0 is based on the same principles as WCAG 1.0. However, it is > designed to be less technology-specific so that it is clearer and easier > to apply those principles to a wide range of technologies. The > Checkpoint Mapping between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 Working Draft shows the > way that the principles of WCAG 1.0 have been generalized in WCAG 2 > > Loretta >
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 07:24:09 UTC