- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 19:45:18 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I would suggest that we only include the terms which are used in the guidelines. We can link to the full glossary or anyone looking for a general-purpose glossary. chaals On Thu, 2 May 2002, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: Note to reviewers: Should we include the entire glossary or just the definitions of terms appearing in the guidelines? We also need to make sure that the <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/Glossary/> glossary definitions are the same as the definitions which appear in the guidelines themselves. For now, a simple list of the terms that are defined in this document are included below. Definitions for each term will be included at a later date. -Ben -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu> -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2002 19:45:19 UTC