- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 23:50:16 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-id: <00d701c1ee70$30e18b40$a6b8fea9@laptop600>
In WCAG 1.0 there was 13.7 If search functions are provided, enable different types of searches for different skill levels and preferences. [Priority 3] this doesn't appear specifically in 2.0 this sounds like it should be part of either OPERABLE or UNDERSTANDABLE. I think it goes in understandable since it sounds like the different forms are provided because a person wouldn't understand a more complex form. It also doesn't sound like a high level checkpoint with level 1 criteria, but rather a success strategy under another. I was thinking it was 4.3 ish. ( Checkpoint 4.3 [3.5] Annotate complex, abbreviated, or unfamiliar information with summaries and definitions But instead it might be 5.4. Checkpoint 5.4 Ensure that user interfaces are accessible or provide an accessible alternative. If your search function is not clear and simple and easy to operate, then you should provide an alternative that is. Thoughts? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu>
Received on Sunday, 28 April 2002 00:50:49 UTC