- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:38:16 -0400
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 11:35 AM 4/26/2002 -0400, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: >Here is the detailed list of editorial changes. The doc is available from: >http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wcag20-requirements > ><...> > >1. Added an abstract. It says: >This document lists the requirements for the Web Content Accessibility >Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0). Appendix A lists a set of statements that the >Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (WCAG WG) has agreed to >while writing WCAG 2.0. These statements will help frame future decisions. This is ambiguous. It sounds like it is a documentation of requirements that were incorporated into a completed document, not the requirements for something that you are building, which is the case here. It sounds as though the statements in the requirements document might be applied to something in the future beyond WCAG 2.0, rather than to decisions on Working Drafts of WCAG 2.0 as it evolves. Moreover, it does not emphasize the fact that feedback on the Requirements document is welcomed, which is a particularly important role of the abstract of a Requirements document. In terms of resolving these ambiguities, actually you've got the ideal text already in place under the "Status" section, at paragraph 2: "This is a W3C Working Draft produced by the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (WCAG WG). The purpose of this document is to outline the requirements for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. The Working Group encourages feedback about these requirements as well as participation in the development of the revision by people who have experience trying to create Web content that conforms to WCAG 1.0." Since it appears that the status section would work fine without that paragraph, and since that paragraph accomplishes everything that's needed in an abstract, and the WCAG WG has already presumably approved that language, I'd recommend moving the 2nd paragraph of the Status section up as a replacement for the abstract that was recently added. - Judy -- Judy Brewer +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 200 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 16:40:56 UTC