- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:56:46 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2002/04/18-minutes.html Summary (also available in the minutes) - Is checkpoint 1.1 testable? JS, LR, and GSW agreed to go through some test files and report conformance on them. We hope this will highlight issues with the checkpoint and perhaps lead us towards providing more helpful informantion in determing conformance. WAC will send a list of test files and general instructions to the list to get people started. - JW proposed a new success criterion to Checkpoint 1.2. However, there are several conformance issues with this checkpoint. Therefore we will leave discussion of this proposal until we have a new draft with a conformance scheme. - Regarding the R1/R2 proposal, we decided to combine them as CMN proposed (with minor editorial edits): The technical requirements of WCAG 2.0 are driven by the needs of people with disabilities. However, the users of WCAG 2.0 are a wide audience, and the requirements it expresses must be in language that policy makers can understand, cite and adopt. While the WCAG WG does not set policy, harmonization of accessibility requirements helps drive demand for supporting implementations in Web applications. - We discussed conformance in general. I missed a lot of this discussion due to questions from the plumber. I think the gist is that GV will publish a new draft before next week's meeting that will include an initial conformance scheme and it will include some idea of site's publishing their own review policy...or coming up with their own. - Agenda items that we did not get to today: 1. Checkpoint 2.1 (in Gregg's reorganization). The following wording has been proposed to address issues of device-independence in this checkpoint: all functions can be operated via character input 2. Treatment of real-time events under checkpoint 2.2 and how these can be made accessible. 3. Lee's email about flicker and how the eye works 4. Lee's proposal for color contrast success criteria - Reminder to review the list of open action items - http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/action-items.html -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative seattle, wa usa /--
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 17:55:12 UTC