- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 00:18:54 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <009d01c1dad7$70fb8480$697ba8c0@laptop600>
Agenda for our telecon Thursday is - Discuss proposed wording for R1 consensus item in the Requirements for WCAG 2.0 document [See below] [Replaces 3 single sentence items, R1,R2, R3 with one integrated statement.] - Quick review for any additional comments on new org before moving into draft. - Quick review of ideas on conformance as input to editors who are drafting language based on F2F discussion and recommendations. - Discuss results of action items from the last 3 meetings Gregg R1: WCAG 2.0 deliverables should be more understandable and usable by a wider audience than was anticipated for WCAG 1.0, including policy makers. While the WCAG WG does not set policy, harmonization of accessibility requirements helps drive demand for supporting implementations in Web applications; therefore WCAG 2.0 should be readily understandable, reference-able, and/or adoptable by policy makers who wish to increase harmonization of Web accessibility requirements. -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu>
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 01:19:23 UTC