- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 13:26:17 -0700
- To: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 11:11 AM 9/29/01 -0400, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote: >if they are looking at 1.1 they can get to The one you send them to isn't really "concrete examples" either - no code. By putting the checklist into tabular form http://rdf.pair.com/xpos.html it's two clicks deep to http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#link-text-images from checkpoint 1.1. Some have found this layout more fun than the checklist document itself? If WCAG2.0 is ever stable, I will do similar presentation for it. -- Love. EACH UN-INDEXED/ANNOTATED WEB POSTING WE MAKE IS TESTAMENT TO OUR HYPOCRISY
Received on Saturday, 29 September 2001 16:23:10 UTC