- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 01:29:48 -0500
- To: "GLWAI Guidelines WG \(GL - WAI Guidelines WG\)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
In the call today we created the following consensus points around big issues 6, 9, 10, and 12 ====== NEW CONSENSUS STATEMENTS ========= N-8 If techniques or examples for a normative checkpoint (guideline) are not generally applicable across web sites, then the checkpoint or guideline must be qualified/restricted to those conditions where the techniques would work. APPLICABILITY - COVERAGE OF GUIDELINES A-1 Cannot make products accessible to all A-2 How to draw the line? As accessible to as many people as we can create the techniques and criterion A-3 We should expend our best effort to identify techniques, criteria and examples that would cover the greatest range possible N-9 Our normative portions would (as qualified) apply to sites in general. Our informative portions can give information that may apply to sites in general or to special targeted sites as long as they are clearly labeled. G-2 Accessibility and usability are intertwined and vary between people and tasks. We think that our distinctions and decisions about normative or importance will be based on something other than categorizing them as an "accessibility" or "usability" items. ======== BIG ISSUES CLOSED ========= 6. Implementation (Should difficulty in implementation affect priority.) { We decided that if something wasn’t doable, then we wouldn’t have any techniques or examples. If it was only doable or needed in certain cases, then it would be qualified. Beyond that we decided that we couldn’t answer the question because we hadn't defined priority -- but that ease of implementation in general shouldn’t affect a rating of importance to do. See N-8 above for CONSENSUS statement dealing with this. } 9. Access for absolutely all? - If not, how to draw line (one suggestion was "BEST EFFORT") {see A-1 to 3 above} 10. Guidelines for all sites vs. special sites {SEE N-9 above } 12. Accessibility vs. usability {SEE G-2 above}
Received on Friday, 28 September 2001 02:30:16 UTC