- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:25:32 -0400
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, "Jonathan Chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>, "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: "WCAG WG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Wendy, Per your note, I'd like to ask those interested in this discussion to let me know private email: apembert@erols.com and I will arrange for a mailing list to discuss the issue. In addition to Jonathan, Chaals, and David P., and Lisa, I hope for input from William and Al ... For those who don't see relevancy, consider the number of times someone gripes about a "best viewed in xxx" note on a web site ... what is a non-confrontational way to tell you how accessible the site may/may not be? Anne At 04:48 PM 9/27/01 -0400, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: >I would like to see discussion about a concrete proposal. If you need to >do the appropriate research to write success criteria, examples, >definitions, and checkpoint text, then please do so. > >I am not saying if there is not consensus on "item X" then we can't >discuss "item X". That's what the group is for: to come to consensus on >issues. What I am saying is "provide a concrete proposal for item X, then >we can discuss it and determine the consensus about item X." > >I do not think you will find the expertise on this list. Therefore, I >think you should do the appropriate research to write a proposal and then >submit one to the list. > >This is something everyone on the list needs to learn to do - do some >research, construct a concrete proposal, then submit it to the group for >discussion. We need to focus on moving through the issues with WCAG 2.0 >so that we can produce a robust deliverable in a reasonable amount of time. > >--wendy > >At 03:59 PM 9/27/01 , Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: >>Wendy your tone seems very aggressive, there can be no reason to insist that >>discussion discontinues,other than consensus. >>Knowing my abilities you will understand that I am seeking further advice, >>and gl is the appropriate place. >>This is a difficult subject, There are plenty of positive examples, as well >>as more awkward ones. >> >>Could we please have some examples which are perhaps novel? >>commerce and games is a positive one from my experience. >> >From real life the introduction of 'actors' into museums, has transformed >>their spirit, from staid to entertaining. >>(This is making information accessible.) >> >>To me the difficulty is not so much the shortage of materials as finding >>pertinent examples. >> >>thanks >> >>jonathan chetwynd >>IT teacher (LDD) >>j.chetwynd@btinternet.com >>http://www.peepo.com "The first and still the best picture directory >>on the web" > >-- >wendy a chisholm >world wide web consortium >web accessibility initiative >seattle, wa usa >/-- Anne Pemberton apembert@erols.com http://www.erols.com/stevepem http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2001 17:37:39 UTC