Minutes from 6 September 2001 WCAG WG

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2001/09/6-minutes.html


6 September 2001 WCAG WG
Present
·       Loretta
·       Wendy
·       Charles
·       Tim
·       Jason
·       Andi
·       Paul
·       Matt
·       Katie
·       Gregg
·       Jo

Regrets
·       Gregory

Microsoft presentation at F2F
Resolved: modify agenda for Monday afternoon and Tuesday morning to 
accomodate Microsoft presentation and discussion.
monday
·       1:30 - 3:30 Presentation and discussion with Microsoft product 
development groups
·       3:30 - 3:45 Break
·       3:45 - 5:30 Break into groups to work on SVG and ECMAScript 
techniques (prep for public working drafts)
tuesday
·       8:30 - 9:00 Continental breakfast
·       9:00 - 10:30 Discussion of comments from latest working draft of 
CSS Techniques and PDF Techniques
Action WC: post list of required readings w/

Techniques Drafts
JW HTML published this evening, PDF earlier today.
WC Would like to compare the 3 techniques documents. Very different. What 
format should they take? How do success criteria relate to 
techniques/technology-specific checkpoints.
JW I can take an action to write up a proposal and capture the issues.
KHS Take existing 3 differences, which is good for each and how they should 
organize the documents.
GV I think of them as being A, B, and C. A = general, non-technology 
specific, B = technology-specific things you had to do, C=in WCAG 1.0 is 
techniques, but notes about how to do it, code, informative info.
Action JW: Write up issues with technology-specific information and 
relation to non-tech info.

$Date: 2001/09/06 23:20:03 $ Wendy Chisholm

--
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
seattle, wa usa
/--

Received on Thursday, 6 September 2001 19:21:14 UTC