- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 16:09:54 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <cyns@opendesign.com>
- cc: <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I agree. Something that worked well in the AU working group was to first put up issues that had a proposed resolution for instant consensus. If anyone objected to the resolution it went back on the table for the agenda, but that way we got rid of a number of issues quite fast, and could concentrate on what was more difficult. Cheers Charles On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 cyns@opendesign.com wrote: I'd like to propose a 4th option: Address the easy questions first, and check them off the to-do list. Then, address the complex and controversial ones, and get through as many as we can in the allotted time. I suspect that we'll be more motivated to close the difficult issues if we know that they are all that stands between us and publication, rather than having a bunch of other work still to do once they're closed.
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2001 16:09:57 UTC