- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 03:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- cc: "'GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Not really. The question is can you provide some idea of what kind of circumstances make it impossible to provide a full text equivalent? Do we mean "it is too hard"? Or do we mean "art cannot be described"? or something else? For the symphony example it is not apparently possible how to have a complete textual alternative. But a description of the 1812 Overture which does convey some of the sense of it is possible, and may be a lot more useful than the label alone. Charles On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: Hi Chas Not sure what your question is. There are lots of cases where it is not possible to have full descriptions. Symphonies is one good example. That is why the criteria allow short labels or descriptions when full description are not possible. Does this answer your question? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send “lists” to listproc@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu> -----Original Message----- From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:charles@w3.org] Subject: Re: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria When is it not possible to provide a text equivalent? Naturally it can be difficult in a variety of cases, but do we have any real guidance on the topic? Otherwise this becomes more or less non-verifiable. Charles On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: in 1.1 propose changing the comment (in the definition section) from To " Note: Depending on the non-text content, a full text equivalent may not be possible. See criteria above." -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 13 August 2001 03:59:18 UTC