- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 03:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- cc: "'GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Not really. The question is can you provide some idea of what kind of
circumstances make it impossible to provide a full text equivalent?
Do we mean "it is too hard"? Or do we mean "art cannot be described"? or
something else?
For the symphony example it is not apparently possible how to have a complete
textual alternative. But a description of the 1812 Overture which does convey
some of the sense of it is possible, and may be a lot more useful than the
label alone.
Charles
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
Hi Chas
Not sure what your question is. There are lots of cases where it is not
possible to have full descriptions. Symphonies is one good example.
That is why the criteria allow short labels or descriptions when full
description are not possible. Does this answer your question?
Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Human Factors
Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis.
Director - Trace R & D Center
Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/>
FAX 608/262-8848
For a list of our listserves send “lists” to listproc@trace.wisc.edu
<mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu>
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:charles@w3.org]
Subject: Re: Proposed edit to note -- to avoid conflict with criteria
When is it not possible to provide a text equivalent? Naturally it can
be
difficult in a variety of cases, but do we have any real guidance on the
topic? Otherwise this becomes more or less non-verifiable.
Charles
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
in 1.1
propose changing the comment (in the definition section) from
To " Note: Depending on the non-text content, a full text equivalent
may
not be possible. See criteria above."
--
Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 13 August 2001 03:59:18 UTC