- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 06:43:12 -0700
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 8:20 AM -0400 2001/8/06, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >CMN What we will be doing is denying that content is accessible just because >it was the best that some team managed to produce, and actually pointing out >what it needs to do in order to achieve "complete" accessibility (well, that >is probably impossible, but the closer we get to that goal the better in >terms of what we are trying to do here). Ooh. I like this, Chaalz. If what we are trying to do is exactly what you say -- define "what makes content more accessible" -- then the argument above is even more compelling. Well-used illustrations most certainly _do_ increase accessibility for a number of audiences. The question persists, though, as to whether or not that is what we have set out to do! --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network Tel +1 949-567-7006 ________________________________________ BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ________________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Monday, 6 August 2001 09:58:21 UTC