- From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:52:46 -0400
- To: "Jonathan Chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>, "gregory j. rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 06:49 AM 7/27/2001 +0100, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: >given that placements are a more subtle way of advertising, perhaps in the >RADAR case and given the client group, it might make sense to advise that an >animated gif is liable to irritate, rather than rely on a medical condition. And not only to irritate. Sometimes it makes it almost impossible to read a text that is near a flickering image as our cognitive system is built to pay attention to the movement. Marja >jonathan chetwynd >IT teacher (LDD) >j.chetwynd@btinternet.com >http://www.peepo.com "The first and still the best picture directory >on the web"
Received on Monday, 30 July 2001 09:55:59 UTC